Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Police too PC to fight real crime

30 replies

BovaryX · 18/02/2020 05:09

In an opinion piece in The Times, Jawad Iqbal writes that the police are too busy pursuing people like Harry Miller over tweets to investigate real crimes He cites that 120,000 people have non crime incidents recorded against them and criticises the role of the CPS in creating this dysfunctional paradigm. In a recent poll by YouGov, only 1 in 9 people have confidence the police will investigate if they are the victim of an actual crime. I hope the government are paying attention. They won the support of first time Conservative voters, inter alia, because of a pledge to be tough on crime. As in crimes that are committed beyond the Twittersphere. When do they plan to start?

The case centred on the designation of non crime incidents. The operational guidance from the College of policing, which sets professional standards, says that officers should record it as a hate incident, regardless of whether there was evidence for the truth of the claim

www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/police-are-too-busy-chasing-pc-causes-to-fight-real-crime-gd9qwjj3n

OP posts:
PreseaCombatir · 20/02/2020 08:56

If they are going to record things like this it needs to be held on a completely separate database. There’s no way anything should ever show up (or even potentially show up) on a dbs, namely because people have no recourse. They can’t defend themselves, and most people can’t just pop of to court to get an addendum added to the note. It just shouldn’t be there in the first place

Lordfrontpaw · 20/02/2020 09:00

Do they record vexious, coordinated or just downright batshit complaints? Just because someone says something is a thought hate crime it doesn’t make it so.

LikeothersIamjustme · 20/02/2020 09:09

If they are going to record things like this it needs to be held on a completely separate database. There’s no way anything should ever show up (or even potentially show up) on a dbs, namely because people have no recourse. They can’t defend themselves, and most people can’t just pop of to court to get an addendum added to the note. It just shouldn’t be there in the first place

Exactly

Smellbellina · 20/02/2020 23:34

As far as I’m aware it wouldn’t show in a DBS, what makes you think it would?

Imnobody4 · 20/02/2020 23:39

Smellbellina
It does show up on an enhanced DBS check. A lot of organisations use this check automatically rather than the lower level one.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page