Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Tories promise to protect freedom of speech

32 replies

BovaryX · 07/02/2020 05:02

It is long overdue, but in the light of an Oxford feminist historian requiring bodyguards because of threats, the Conservatives have finally promised to protect academic freedom. It is quite incredible that a group of aggressive bullies think they can impose their authoritarian views on everyone else and silence dissent. It is time for a robust defence of freedom of speech.

In an article for The Times, Gavin Williamson says that universities must make clear that intimidation of academics by student or other protesters is unacceptable, issue strong sanctions and work with police to prosecute those who try to disrupt events. He is considering greater regulation, possibly through law, if universities do not promote “unambiguous guidance” on academic freedom and free speech. One measure under consideration is to “clarify the duties” of students’ unions.“Universities themselves could be doing much more in this area,” Mr Williamson writes. “The right to civil and non-violent protest is sacrosanct. However, intimidation, violence or threats of violence are crimes

OP posts:
Mockersisrightasusual · 07/02/2020 18:20

I do hope we are going to be allowed to mock religion

(Seventh Day Adventists: Ha Ha Hah!)

BovaryX · 07/02/2020 18:36

That said - I'm not sure it's the responsibility of feminists to 'own' free speech. Aware that PP has campaigned on a variety of issues so not directed at her specifically. It just sometimes feels a bit like remit creep

Is it? Who could have envisaged a scenario where Germaine Greer is denounced and no platformed? By alleged progressives? The authoritarian zealots who are dictating policy in the 21st century and shutting down feminist historians? They need to be challenged and they need to be challenged on the basis of freedom of speech. Why shouldn't feminists do that?

OP posts:
Dozer · 07/02/2020 18:39

Fucking ridiculous that it’s Gavin Williamson.

Thinkingabout1t · 07/02/2020 19:34

Pragna Patel to head a free-speech organisation? YES! In our dreams at this stage, maybe, but let's hope.

And we need to look out for that consultation,
www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime/
as it seems to be more about possibly extending the law. Not necessarily a bad idea, as some feminists want misogyny added to the list. I don't want the police harassing people who say mammals can't change sex. But I think there's more widespread anger at the police wasting time on what's seen as trivia, than there is about the loss of freedom of speech.

The consultation is meant to start this year. I hope it will be more genuinely publicised than the 2018 GRA 'consultation', which afaik most people never heard about.

SunkissesBringBackLangCleg · 07/02/2020 21:15

Commitments to freedom of speech were also in the Conservative manifesto (pages 23 and 48): "We will champion freedom of expression and tolerance, both in the UK and overseas" and (page 37): "We will also strengthen academic freedom and free speech in universities and continue to focus on raising standards"

Imnobody4 · 07/02/2020 22:24

I find this heartening- there is intelligent life among students
www.oxfordstudent.com/2019/11/08/osfd-founder-maya-thomas-on-free-speech-at-oxford/

TheBewildernessisWeetabix · 07/02/2020 22:32

Having funded the lobbyists who promote authoritarianism at Uni they will now investigate authoritarianism at uni. Brilliant.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread