Long-term poster but name-changed due to risk of being identified by a colleague who may be able to identify me due to previous posts.
Had a disagreement with this colleague about our workplace's approach to supporting people who are or may be trans. I have been quietly GC for a while and the colleague's reaction to this discussion really shocked me. Colleague said that discussion about anything to do with trans issues was like racism and got very aggressive.
The conversation then went away from the workplace-related stuff and I said that I could see why females may not want to share changing rooms, prisons, refuges or other safe spaces with people with male bodies (was choosing my words carefully). I said that even if all genuine trans women were harmless, wouldn't a law that opened all doors to anyone who said they were any sex or gender allow predatory and non-genuine trans women AKA men be harmful to biologically female women? Obviously then got called transphobic and a T*RF. I said I was a MERF (M being male) when it came to single-sex spaces, but had no phobia of genuine trans people at all. Gave the examples of Jessica Yaniv and Karen White and got the answer that they are made-up and not genuine trans women anyway. Ok, I said, so that is exactly my point. Colleague stomped off.
Why is it seen as so radical to defend web-based rights? Why is it so controversial to point out that a penis can be dangerous to others in a way that a vagina just isn't? Why are women's/ female rights suddenly a taboo topic?