Mr X

[Verily1]

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7778997/Police-launch-rape-investigation-one-Britains-richest-men.html

Is this the same as the Mr Jones one also posted, or two separate men do you think?

www.ft.com/content/afffb542-f577-11e9-b018-3ef8794b17c6

I hope the DM will continue to chip away at this story. Hopefully the days are gone where our police were influenced by the "old boy network". Anonymity should not be given because of wealth or status and until all suspected rapists are afforded this privilege, please name the person concerned (perhaps abroad) if sufficient evidence is found pre-trial.

I suspect it is the same man. Will FT get away with it by not mentioning the rape accusation?

I was wondering if Mr X was perhaps a bit blue and yellow.

@TheCompleteNonSequitur, I agree. And if that's the case, keeping his name secret can hardly tarnish his reputation further. Nor will it come as any particular surprise to anyone. So why the secrecy, unless the courts are aware of the absolute transparency of the establishment protecting the establishment, and don't care. Our infrastructure is rotten from top to bottom.

But the tabloids will subtly tell the story. Watch out for a bunch of stories about the person in question, which say nothing about current circumstances or do anything to break the court injunction, but which sutbly point to the person in question by the mere fact that the stories are there.

But the tabloids will subtly tell the story. Watch out for a bunch of stories about the person in question, which say nothing about current circumstances or do anything to break the court injunction, but which sutbly point to the person in question by the mere fact that the stories are there.

Well the first thought to me was that I had read of unspecified complaints about a rather rich man, but surely it can't be that one?!