When I studied history at university, it was standard practice to look at a variety of sources and evaluate each one critically. This contemporary idea of declaring some people or publications "good" and consuming their output uncritically, while refusing to read or watch the people or publications deemed "bad" is so bizarre to me.
Anyway, the interviewee here is Madeleine Kearns, not Shapiro. She gets a lot of important detail across in a short time.
Kat, I agree it is stunning and distressing how a few well-placed ideologues have managed, without evidence to back their conclusions, to change official stances for massive professional organizations.
I had read parts of what Kearns addresses in this article and interview before, but I believe this is the first article in an American publication to really pull it all together. She also adds some new (to me at least) information, such as that several families across the country in situations similar to the James Younger custody/pediatric transing case have contacted her, and that many of them are under gag orders from courts.