HRA/GIDS admit purpose of blockers is to progress to cross-sex hormones

[Fallingirl]

Just seen this from Michael Biggs and TransgenderTrend.

www.transgendertrend.com/health-research-authority-puberty-blockers-commit-children-permanent-physical-transition/

Well done bd67th

They can get to fuck if they think this is going to vanish. I’ve alerted my MP, for all the good it will do the problem is that to people just dipping in to little bits of information they’re not seeing the big picture. I wish this would be picked up by one of the big papers and them do a massive piece on it. A bit like the Telegraph did with that dreadful President’s Dinner. I want the whole fucking country to know what they’re doing to children. I don’t want GIDS to be able to obfuscate and bury this. They still haven’t reported the full data from their study have they? Sorry I’m tired and on phone can’t remember exactly which one. They ought to be closed down. They’re obviously completely incapable of making good clinical decisions and it is utterly, scandalously, horrifically wrong that they are still fast-tracking children through a process to the awful lifelong problems faced as a permanent medical patient. Lack of sterility. Loss of sexual function. Excruciating pain for girls as their womb atrophies. Osteoporosis. And GIDS fucking know. They’re doing this in plain sight. God it makes me so angry I can hardly be coherent about it

Placemarking.

I’ve been thinking further about the certainty that those on the study wouldn’t be in the 80%. Do GIDS have empirical evidence that this is the case? Do they hold any evidence that proves their assertions? How did they select the children for the study - did they use suicidal ideation or self harm as a marker of seriousness? It concerns me to think, especially with the dodgy suicide statistics and the language used by Mermaids - better to have a living son than a dead daughter, that suicide threats or attempts can be used to get blockers.

As for the HRA did they just take GIDS word for the cohort not being in the 80%?

What of the now commonplace use of blockers in GIDS for those not on the study - do they simply apply the thinking of those that shout loudly enough for blockers can have them?