Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Saw this and thought of you

6 replies

donquixotedelamancha · 29/09/2019 11:36

theelectricagora.com/2019/09/27/gender-what-is-it-good-for-absolutely-nothing/

I don't think this article has been posted already. It's an excellent (and easy reading) discussion of why gender roles became successful but are now harmful. It exposes how silly and inconsistent the Genderist obsession with Gender Identity is.

The article sees Genderism as the mainstream Feminist position and contrasts it with radical Feminism. I'm interested how that will go down here.

OP posts:
Mermoose · 29/09/2019 12:31

Great article. It's very clear and to the point.

It's reasonable to say that genderism is the mainstream feminist position but personally I'd say it's more accurate to call it the establishment feminist position. Among politicians, well-funded and well-established women's organisations, and academics, genderism is popular. But among the wider public, I don't think people really know enough about what it entails to be called supporters of it, and I think what public support there is for it relies precisely on people not knowing what it entails.

donquixotedelamancha · 29/09/2019 12:34

It's reasonable to say that genderism is the mainstream feminist position but personally I'd say it's more accurate to call it the establishment feminist position.

Sadly, I think that is true. It was just striking to read it in such stark terms.

OP posts:
Cuntysnark · 29/09/2019 12:37

Haven’t read it yet but this a clear piece too.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/the-wests-own-problem-of-minorityism/

Mermoose · 30/09/2019 08:42

Just bumping this as I honestly think it's the most succinct and easily-accessible article I've read on this debate.

donquixotedelamancha · 04/10/2019 22:01

Just bumping this as I honestly think it's the most succinct and easily-accessible article I've read on this debate.

Really good, isn't it? There is a lot of potential reading on this site so it can be overwhelming- but I think this one is worth a couple of minutes.

OP posts:
NonnyMouse1337 · 04/10/2019 22:47

Interesting article. While I agree that there is a hyper individualism in the West and quite a bit of focus on the superficial and the aesthetic, I don't think it's something that is necessarily unique to the West.

I think the obsession with women's beauty is common in many cultures around the world, present and past.

Gendered roles and expectations arise over time from certain differences between men and women.

Like other animals, human beings are strongly driven to procreate. This leads to certain behaviour and interactions between the sexes. Men are expected to advertise their virility while women are expected to signal their fertility.

Various masculine acts and behaviours become associated with virility, such as showing off physical strength, signalling superiority over other men via material wealth or intellect and so on.
Similarly, various feminine acts and behaviours become associated with fertility and women throughout history have sought to enhance their beauty and their body to advertise their potential as a mate.

Both men and women seek to validate their suitability as a reproductive partner in various ways and this isn't confined to people in the West.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page