My dilemma is this. I work for an organisation that is not known as “woke” and if I named it a. It would out me but b. You would not say “That’s a woke organisation”.
Unfortunately it has odd hiring practices and its HR department is probably woke. I, as an employee, have been summoned to HR training on “diversity and equality”. After training/indoctrination we will be asked to fill in a tick box test, the likes of which I've done before and which is standard rubbish (“Don’t wolf whistle”, “don’t look up women’s skirts” – the boilerplate you can do with your eyes closed and without any special training). Any idiot has passed the sort of training given before.
The problem is I've been given advance sight of the subjects of this year’s tests (just subjects, not questions) and the sixth or so out of eight tests is called *Gender reassignment”. It comes after 'Pregnancy & maternity” and before “Sex discrimination”. (Again, boilerplate tests that have been given before)
I'm worried the gender assignment test will basically involve stuff that I, and I imagine some of my colleagues, know isn’t law yet ie self ID. In which case do I answer in line with the (present) law and reality, or in line with woke lies? I'm sure the people at the top of the organisation would be against self ID but they are way too busy to care about the training of small fry. Do I just tell woke lies for fear of being sacked (“the correct pronoun for Rhys McKinnon is she/her as she identifies as female) or do I tell the truth? We've been told we might have our passes revoked if we don't do the training, but nothing on whether we do it then give un-woke answers.