It was submitted for Wilson that a significant distinction was that the images did not involve children or abuse of children and it was said that Wilson "never intended any harm" to his victims.
Well isn't that completely predictable and fancy? The victims were women so who cares? And because the poor poor poor man didn't intend (wtf?) to cause harm it is totally okay.
The tribunal noted that [he] (sic) seemed to ignore "significant stress, humiliation and embarrassment that those victims suffered on learning of the offending".
Uh... yeah because he doesn't think he did anything wrong. Because obviously women aren't people and transgressions committed against them can just be washed away with explaining that the transgressor didn't intend harm. Makes total sense I think I'm getting it now.
Despite thinking "long and hard about making an order for cancellation", the Tribunal concluded that "this is not a case where such cancellation is necessary for protection of the public or maintenance of standards".
Yep nothing to see here people, move along slap on the wrist has been carried out - he is in no danger to any female patient known or unknown. Puppies, rainbows, unicorns, and candy - the world is just magical.