I can't understand for the life of my why a young woman who then wants to be a man would then retain her female reproductive organs. Surely that's not a full transition then?
The whole ideology is based on some sort of vague internal sense of self that trans people have, detached from material reality, so eg if you are a transwoman with a penis, you have a fully functioning "female penis", and if you are a transman who gestated and gives birth to and breastfeeds a baby, you are a man who gave birth, "end of". Then you get two "lesbians" getting married where one of them impregnates the other with "her" dick, and everyone is supposed to clap and go on about how brave and stunning they are.
No need to physically transition at all.
Gender ideologists who are fully immersed in this belief system will say things like "I don't have dysphoria about my physical anatomy, only my pronouns" so they make the people around them change the way they talk about them (new name, new pronouns etc) without actually changing a single thing about their physical appearance. Look up Alex Drummond, a bepenised and fully bearded person who says they are a woman, insists on female pronouns, and advises the Labour Party and Stonewall on trans stuff.
To be fair phalloplasty has something like an 80% failure rate when tried on a female person, so I wouldn't advise it. I wouldn't advise a hysterectomy and lifelong dependency on injecting testosterone either, it's very cool these days, but lots of girls who want to identify out of womanhood are not actually doing this, all you need to do it change your Facebook profile to be considered "a man".
I basically object to being forced into pretending women who give birth are men. I find it really offensive. So fuck off BBC.