O'Donnell v Times unfair dismissal case

[MrsSnippyPants]

twitter.com/kathy__odonnell/status/1164787646536617984
"I am disappointed with the judgement of the tribunal in my discrimination and unfair dismissal case against Times Newspapers Ltd. Working with my barrister, we are considering an appeal.
To my witnesses and all who have supported me over the past two years, thank you."

Congratulations to the Times and their legal team.

Well that's good news.

Good.

Excellent news. A rare victory for common sense. And well done to the Times for their continued bravery in reporting this issue, in the face of abuse and intimidation.

Well done The Times

They're saying that changing the system is going to open the door to lots of dodgy types

Incredible, the Times declining to drop news articles because a regional sub editor says so is not unfair dismissal?

Still, there is always the upcoming case of people who were 'forced' to resign from the Guardian because it published an editorial they didn't agree with. That's definitely unlawful discrimination- they'll surely win.

Weirdly I've pasted the wrong quite there, apologies.

Hahahaha

That is all.

Very keen to read this judgement, hopefully there will be a link somewhere soon.

Good.

oh, what a blow, Kathy. Chin up!

from the Times www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/tribunal-rejects-trans-discrimination-claim-nwsmrls9q

Good, to be frank, having read the The Times's response to the case, I didn't expect anything else.

I think it's fair to suggest that O'Donnell was not discriminated against, but in fact, opportunistically sued the Times because they objected to the articles the Times has published highlighting the issues with transactivism - particularly the issues with medicalising children. The Times has been really good at reporting this - and the TRA hate it.

Thank goodness for that.

Again, common sense has prevailed. When these cases see daylight, they always do.

This is indeed good news and a victory for common sense. I hope the appeal fails.

Does anyone have a share token?

Good. I'd be interested to read the wording of the judgement too.

19 day hearing!

Yes, I would really like to plough through that

Well I'm so shocked and surprised that someone without a case but with a huge entitlement which has been constantly enabled, has lost this case.

Want to bet the case against the guardian gets quietly dropped now?

19 day hearing!

I'm sure it was a fabulous outlet for the narc rage that had built up - I can imagine a lot of time was taken up explaining how stunning and brave, and yet oppressed, O'Donnell was.

"to be nearer her children"

Here’s a shareToken. www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tribunal-rejects-trans-discrimination-claim-nwsmrls9q?shareToken=5a242710154d7972b666e3377a9c3dd5

I wish I could read the whole article as the opening few paragraphs seem to be complaining that O'Donnell, presumably in common with other staff at the Scottish edition, lost their job due to production being moved to London.

If every Scot who had lost their job due to production being moved to London could claim unfair dismissal an awful lot of companies would no longer exist.

I'm really struggling to sympathise given O'Donnell was apparently quite happy to be four hundred miles away from O'Donnell's children when it suited O'Donnell.

Damn, posted before I saw the share token.

Jesus, so O'Donnell was, in fact, offered an equal job and refused?

Boo fucking hoo.

I know hundreds of people who lost jobs due to production moves and weren't offered equal jobs elsewhere. Fucking over-privileged wanker.