Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Julie Burchill - GC article

66 replies

Hullabalooo · 25/07/2019 05:57

FEMINISM - THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM - Julie Burchill

"Until January 2013, I’d never thought much about transsexuals. If pushed, I’d have said I felt vaguely sorry for them, as I do white people who pretend to be black or my teenage self when I pretended to be Jewish. It’s unfortunate to be confused about what you are once you’re past adolescence.

And then they went after my friend.

I don’t mind anyone having a pop at me. I’ve enjoyed copious fame and fortune from dishing it out, and not being able to take it would make me a sissy and a hypocrite. Also, kinkily, I enjoy a bit of verbal abuse, finding it bracing in the manner of a cold swim.

But my weak spot has always been people picking on my mates; when that happens, I see red. Ironically, the piece that the angry trans-mob took exception to was part of a compilation about Female Anger, in which my friend mentioned that are women are sick and tired of being told to aspire to impossible ideals in all areas of their lives, one of which was achieving ‘the body of a Brazilian transsexual.’

I was exchanging some bitchy quips on Facebook about the ensuing Twitter brouhaha while getting ready to go out when an Observer commissioning editor asked me - BEGGED ME! - to fashion them swiftly into a piece. When I said they were just for my friends entertainment and that I was busy, I was offered twice my usual word rate. I’m only human! I dashed off a quick piece, in which intemperate language such as bed-wetters in bad wigs may have been used. But I was by now an Angry Female - my mate was getting death threats and the police had been called in. I went out and thought no more of it.

I awoke on Sunday morning to a right old rumpus in the small and self-important world of the media. Some Lib-Dem MP with delusions of adequacy was calling for me to be sacked from the Observer; this would have been difficult because I had no contract with them even though I wrote for them regularly - a situation which, the editor John Mulholland was soon murmuring comfortingly on the phone, would continue.

Within 24 hours the column had been expunged from the Guardian/Observer website and I was never hired by the Observer again. Luckily, I was richer and tougher than all the bed-wetters (bad-wigged or otherwise) who both pilloried me and lost their nerve when it came to hiring me and survived my Wilderness Years pretty well, writing only for the bold and unbowed Spectator and Spiked until the Telegraph hired me last year.

Looking back, I see that I was the first person to be demonised by the allegedly liberal, free-thinking Establishment who have continued to crumble in the face of the surreal demands of the Call-Me-Madam mad-men; in academia, in psychiatry, in medicine and now, most bizarrely, in the case of the Canadian beauticians being prosecuted for refusing to wax the scrotum of a repulsive cross-dresser. Whereas misogyny was historically Right-wing, it’s now hysterically Left-wing. We see it best in those vile cry-bullies the Woke Bros, who have found a fresh’n’funky way to hate women without seeming like sexist dinosaurs.

There’s a really good way to justify hitting women if you’re a Woke Bro - just call them TERFs and punching them becomes a brave anti-fascist action instead of the default setting of every cowardly wanker who would never dare to hit a man. 62% of women at university have experienced sexual assault, 56% by known perpetrators - a lot of them will be Woke Bros. Women report being choked by male sexual partners - ‘Breath-Play’ to give it its innocent-sounding sex-name - to an extraordinary extent; that’ll be those Woke Bros who feel no guilt about watching porn because, hey, sex work is work like any other kind. (Except when it comes to their sisters.) Pornography-using men who call themselves feminists are so monumentally dumb that they probably delude themselves that the reason why the average age of death for a female performer is 37 is because they die of pleasure - having all those orgasms! An astonishing number of the showbiz sleazes called out in MeToo identified as feminists - Woke Bros to a man. But most of all, you’ll find them taking the side of female impersonators against born females.

The Woke War Against Women is well and truly under way and the Woke Witch Trials have started. So I’m extraordinarily pleased that I called out the poisonousness of the New Misogyny right from the start - and to be financially supporting this event by MAKE MORE NOISE. I’ve said it before - but I knew I was right. What a fascinating time to be a feminist!"

What are your thoughts? We'd love to hear what you have to say!

Want to come and see women speak about feminism's elephant in the room? Come to Manchester this Saturday. www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/feminism-the-elephant-in-the-room-tickets-64496743496

OP posts:
teflontania · 25/07/2019 23:43

Another Julie Burchill article that tells you more about her ego than anything else.

FloralBunting · 25/07/2019 23:45

Brilliant article. Fabulous woman. Love it.

ZebrasAreBras · 26/07/2019 00:44

Spot on. Julie is fabulous.

The "MeToo" men who claimed to be feminists.

The woke blokes who watch porn and call themselves feminists - because "sex work is work."

The lefty dude bros who threaten women with violence - call them terfs & swerfs - because they can.

Men's rights activism - that's all it is.

HorsewithnoRegretsNonJeNeRegre · 26/07/2019 07:03

Another Julie Burchill article that tells you more about her ego than anything else.

Another Teflon Tony post that tells you more about his ego than anything else.

TheBigBallOfOil · 26/07/2019 07:35

God forbid a woman should have an ego, eh?

Erythronium · 26/07/2019 08:24

Julie's ego is a national treasure.

terryleather · 26/07/2019 08:37

Julie's ego is a national treasure.

GrinGrinGrin

FloralBunting · 26/07/2019 08:42

Bring on the women with egos, who don't think it's their place in life to be quietly humble and obedient. Cracking.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 26/07/2019 08:58

Julie's ego is a national treasure

I'm picturing it 20m high like the angel of the north

I'd certainly go on a cycling holiday through the countryside around Brighton to see that

TheBigBallOfOil · 26/07/2019 09:26

I go to Brighton very often and I have never actually seen Julie’s massive ego or, indeed, Julie, but I live in hope.

Ameanstreakamilewide · 26/07/2019 12:48

Julie's biography on Princess Diana was fantastic.

She describes herself as
'The cynic of the world. The cynic's cynic'.

Julie's genuinely a zero fucks given sorta woman and I like that.

allmywhat · 26/07/2019 13:03

Wow, I vaguely knew the story about how she got into trouble for that article - the phrase "bedwetters in bad wigs" is one that sticks in the memory - but I never realised that the trans movement was the reason she wasn't writing columns any more! Fucksake. I love her writing.

I wish more women could tell it like we see it, the way she does. The world would be in a better shape if we didn't tiptoe around men and their egos so much.

hipsterfun · 27/07/2019 10:43

The Burch is back Grin

PencilsInSpace · 27/07/2019 11:21

Within 24 hours the column had been expunged from the Guardian/Observer website

It was then hosted on Gendertrender until the whole blog was also expunged Angry

Archived here:

<a class="break-all" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130115210700/gendertrender.wordpress.com/2013/01/13/transsexuals-should-cut-it-out/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">web.archive.org/web/20130115210700/gendertrender.wordpress.com/2013/01/13/transsexuals-should-cut-it-out/

RoyalCorgi · 27/07/2019 14:00

I'm pleased to say that back in 2013 I'm one of the people who wrote to the Readers' Editor to say they shouldn't have removed the column.

What was obvious to me then (and I pointed out in my email) was that this whole furore was being driven by people who didn't even read the Observer. They were just people who'd been whipped up into a frenzy on social media and then acted offended. If you're going to remove a piece, at least do so because your own readers have been upset, not because a whole bunch of people who have never forked out £2 for your newspaper in their lives are having a temper tantrum over it.

Unfortunately that was the beginning of a now well-established trend in which people get hysterical on social media over the publication of articles that they would be blissfully unaware of if other people weren't generating fake anger about them on Twitter.

C8H10N4O2 · 27/07/2019 14:49

Whereas misogyny was historically Right-wing, it’s now hysterically Left-wing

Oh that line has never been true. The far left has always provided a welcome home for misogyny - from sexual assault of women in the cause to campaigning against equal pay for women.

I agree with PP who say they hide it better. Look for phrases along the lines of women's rights coming with the greater struggle for human rights and other such bollocks.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread