Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is digital media perverting democracy and polarising debate? Select committee call for evidence.

2 replies

ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving · 24/07/2019 22:32

Call for evidence:

With the growth of digital media, methods of political communication and campaigning have evolved. The impact of digital technologies on our democratic processes has come under increasing scrutiny. Many are of the view that digital technologies offer significant potential benefits for the extension of democracy, while others fear that such technologies may actually undermine the democratic process. As well as covering the effects of digital technologies on the electoral process and political campaigns, the Committee wishes to consider the effects of technology on political debate more broadly, and the wider public’s engagement with and participation in political discourse. The Committee has decided to focus on the issue of how representative democracy can be supported, rather than undermined, in a digital world. It will primarily look across six key areas: transparency in political campaigns; privacy and anonymity; misinformation; the effects of digital technologies on public discourse; how technology can facilitate democracy and the development of effective digital literacy.

www.parliament.uk/democ-digital-committee/written-submission-form

Questions include:

Would greater transparency in the online spending and campaigning of political groups improve the electoral process in the UK by ensuring accountability, and if so what should this transparency look like?

To what extent does social media negatively shape public debate, either through encouraging polarisation or through abuse deterring individuals from engaging in public life?

and

How could the moderation processes of large technology companies be improved to better tackle abuse and misinformation, as well as helping public debate flourish?

Between Twitters mass blocking of CG feminists trying to discuss a government consultation, Edward Lord trying to bias a public consultation by blocking anyone who disagreed with his desired outcome and then only tweeting it to his remaining followers, the shady going ons of Stonewall and the like, especially that fucking Pop n' Ollie "fill out the GRA consultation, kids" video, there should be plenty here for everyone to comment on!

OP posts:
TheInebriati · 24/07/2019 22:38

Netflix have made a documentary about Cambridge Analytica, I think I'll watch it before I give this one a go.

To what extent does social media negatively shape public debate, either through encouraging polarisation or through abuse deterring individuals from engaging in public life?
It doesn't have to be actual abuse, does it? Just endless amounts of minimising will wreck a discussion.

Enclume · 24/07/2019 22:42

The misinformation head is ringing the biggest bells for me. Who decides what that is? Are they going to persecute people for dangerous 'misinformation' such as 'the term "woman" means having XX chromosomes'? Will my ISP provider eventually block me from visiting Mumsnet where such heresies are peddled?

As for this,

what should this transparency look like?

Do they ever hear the shit they come with?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread