Fencing has rules about T
Pretorious and why fencing associations and allies are standing by a transgender champion:
Chris Mostert, chairperson of the Gauteng Fencing Association, said: “I don’t have a problem with transgender athletes. If women are going to lose against Pretorius, then they didn’t deserve to win.”
...
Thobekile Moyo of the Wits fencing team said she had a fair competition against Pretorius.
“Her only slight advantage is how tall she is, but every fencer has some sort of physical advantage.”
Alex Collings, a University Sports SA referee, said Pretorius had a deep understanding of the rules and technical nuances of the foil (one of the weapons categories), which is why she stood out – not because of her physical attributes.
city-press.news24.com/News/athletes-come-out-in-support-of-transgender-fencer-20190706
I don't know where to start. This is more than one physical advantage when it's 'advantages' that favour one sex's physiology rather than another. If the young fencer doesn't realise that extra height and reach and (probably) faster reflex reactions and greater explosive force are relevant when facing an opponent with a different physiology then experience may well change her present opinion.
But - that referee's remark defies all explanation and understanding.
There's a form of feminism and fairness that protects all women and there's a form of feminism and fairness that strips sex-based protections from women - I have no confusion as to what is on display here.