I hope this qualifies as a feminism thread: it's kind of inspired by the various climate change threads popping up.
I keep reading (and agree) that population levels are the big elephant in the room, so to speak - that no matter how many reuseable wipes we switch to, or electric cars we choose, the resources needed to support the lives of 10+ billion people on this planet will confound all attempts to address climate change.
One oft-proposed solution to this is the education and emancipation of girls and women in the developing world: as they are lifted out of poverty, they have fewer children. But doesn't that just mean that their /their families expectations of living standards will also rise? That they will (rightly) expect their higher levels of education and wealth to translate to running water, roads, houses, universities etc and all the consumer / leisure stuff that we in the developed world already have access to. Isn't this what drives women and girls to reach higher? Doesn't it just shift the problem from lots of people living low-impact lives, to fewer people living much higher-impact lives?