@MrsDumpty
Sarah Phillimore mentioned it in one of her tweets/posts. I've also done a bit of chatting with former colleagues, some journalists, some not, but all involved in print media. Most hadn't heard of it, or if they had weren't saying anything, one did query the video later though. What seems to be giving the NSPCC a bit of an out clause from what I can gather, is that although the original video is marked 'at work', one of the first people to screen shot and circulate, added the annotation 'at work at a children's charity' to emphasize. The claims of bullying might be related to that, as Makings could claim that he didn't specify where he was and that those nasty internet trolls have done all this bla blah blah, at the same time avoiding discussion about why any amateur porn could be linked to his role at the NSPCC in the first place or any of the other more pertinent safeguarding concerns around this whole mess.
IMO Spiked have got it just about right, they've stayed safe in legal terms at least. Tacking the story onto the end of an article like this is a bit strange though, rather than making it a feature. Perhaps it's their way of getting it out there without too much fanfare and therefore legal scrutiny? Or perhaps the media world just moves so fast these days, they feel a full story wouldn't have any impact after it's been splashed all over Twitter.