Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'How to be a Woman on Twitter' by Professor Alessandra Asteriti (who is one of many women suspended/banned following targetted reporting)

5 replies

R0wantrees · 06/06/2019 10:12

Uncommon Ground article:

(extract)
Socialist, feminist women are being purged from twitter for expressing the ‘wrong’ opinions. Professor Alessandra Asteriti tells her story.
On 28 May 2019, I saw on my TL on Twitter an article about how Imperial College, with funding provided by the NHS, is planning to trial womb transplants on transgender women. The wombs would be sourced either from dead women donors, or from transmen wanting a hysterectomy. Amongst the proponents of the procedure, a plastic surgeon from London, who runs a clinic where surgical procedures are offered to transgender people wanting to undergo a complete sex change (which for transmen includes a complete mastectomy and hysterectomy; the trans community likes to refer to these as top and bottom operations, partially to obfuscate, partially to make them sound harmless by adopting an infantile language. But they are operations that render these females sterile and deprive them of their breasts and uterus. Any woman who has wished to be sterilised will know how difficult it is to get this operation done, as doctors will tell them that they might change their mind. Trans rights groups advocate for minors to be able to undergo these operations). The article further suggested the wombs could come from transmen, in my opinion evidencing a clear conflict of interests for these doctors, who have a financial incentive to convince transmen to undergo an hysterectomy in order to have a supply of wombs to implant into transwomen.

I had already been critical of gender theory on Twitter, which I consider a regressive and misogynist approach to rights, both of women and of trans people. Additionally, I have been particularly vocal about the gaslighting of women on social media, forced to accept that the penis can be a female organ and accused of being transphobic if they refuse to accept this piece of anti-scientific, obscurantist misogynist propaganda (I am not mincing words). This has included putting pressure on lesbians to accept male-bodied ‘lesbians’ and giving them advice on how to have sex with these transwomen. Many lesbians have complained that this practice is particularly damaging for younger lesbians who might be struggling with their sexuality and might be bullied into accepting sex with males.

I believe that women have the right of self-determination, and this right includes the absolute right to exclude males from our sex group. (continues)

I believe asking women to refer to sex offenders as women is a form of group libel and to force victims to do so a further, extreme violence. Women do not rape. Women engage in sexual offences, especially against children, in extremely small numbers. Sexual violence is male violence, and 35% of women around the world are victims of it (and this is probably a conservative number) and have the absolute right to call it out for what it is.

I believe women have an absolute right to female-only spaces, and males have no right to try to invade those spaces on the basis of feelings. Woman is something you are, not something you feel. More girls died of female infanticide than people died in World War II (UN data) and they died because being female is something you do not choose.

For my beliefs, and for the following tweet: (see screenshot)

I was suspended from Twitter indefinitely. It is clear that I am concerned here with ideology, not the community of transgender individuals. The doctors to whom the criticism is directed are probably not transgender, or not necessarily transgender.

I know many academics, especially females, agree with me but are afraid to say so. I know many women decide to be anonymous on Twitter because they are afraid of losing their jobs, or of the threats of violence and rape that accompany expressing feminist opinions (I have received them. The people who wished me dead or raped are still on Twitter, because apparently wishing a woman dead or raped is not hateful. Twitter does not protect sex as a category, only gender, but it seems that if you reject gender stereotypes, you also forfeit any protection as a woman)." (continues)
uncommongroundmedia.com/woman-twitter-alessandra-asteriti/

'How to be a Woman on Twitter' by Professor Alessandra Asteriti (who is one of many women suspended/banned following targetted reporting)
OP posts:
beagadorsrock · 06/06/2019 10:14

Her ban was one of the most ridiculous, in a crowded field

nevernotstruggling · 06/06/2019 10:18

This is pushing me to just quit Twitter

clitherow · 06/06/2019 10:28

It is clear that I am concerned here with ideology, not the community of transgender individuals. The doctors to whom the criticism is directed are probably not transgender, or not necessarily transgender.

This is what is tying my head in knots at the moment. So many vulnerable people are being dragged along by an ideology that will throw them in the bin when it is done with them. But if you try to tell them, they think that you are the oppressor and lash out - just like the attack on Julie Bindel. I am in awe at the way she justs keeps plugging away.

R0wantrees · 06/06/2019 11:28

This is what is tying my head in knots at the moment. So many vulnerable people are being dragged along by an ideology that will throw them in the bin when it is done with them. But if you try to tell them, they think that you are the oppressor and lash out

cf George Orwell, 'Nineteen Eighty Four' on 'the two minutes of hate:

"The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one's will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate

H/t RP

OP posts:
stumbledin · 06/06/2019 14:25

I've said this before so sorry for anyone who thinks I am repeating myself but why do women waste so much energy on twitter. It is one of the least used social media platforms, especially by women. And it is hostile to women.

The only plus side to twitter is that really lazy journalists who cant be bothered to research stories will sometimes pick up on twitter threads to stitch together an article. But as they nearly always ignore women's point of view it is hardly a positive.

If you were starting a campaign to reach out to women (and possible supporters) why would you focus on an area in society that women dont participate in. And again, as said before, this is like trying to get in touch with local people in a town with supremarkets, laundrettes, supermarkets, libraries, parks, etc., etc., and you think I'll ignore all of those and I'll go to that really dodgy bar were aggressive male drinkers hand out and leaflet them?

How is it that so many women have bought into this male promotion of what is important.

Facebook and instagram have far higher numbers of female users.

Are the men in our heads still so powerful that what we think will really mark as out as sucessful is to be acknowledges (and then forgotten) by hostile men?

I just dont get it.

And now women's time and energy is going towards getting women banned from twitter back on twitter.

All that wasted energy by women trying to get men's attention and ignoring places where women can be reached.

Or is that what feminist campaigning is? Trying to get men's attention?!! Confused

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread