Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

AIBU: The Green Party

107 replies

LegoToast · 01/05/2019 19:15

So, tomorrow is the local elections. There are five candidates in my ward: Labour, Conservatives, an independent, UKIP, and the Greens.

I will be spoiling my ballot.

Ten years ago, I would have voted for the Greens. Their views were the closest to my own. But now, I’d rather vote UKIP as a protest vote than give the Greens anything at all.

Out of all the parties, I feel that they have been hit the hardest by the Kool Aid. A tiny party that was unknowingly dominated with a challenging ideology. They didn’t stop and think. They saw new people with new ideas and accepted them gladly. The lost good genuine people over this issue as well as tons of voters.

The Greens were the party of science and logic. But now they’re nothing more than meaningless “woke” statements hidden behind a veneer of environmental activism.

I couldn’t join even if I wanted to. I’d only be expelled for having the wrong facts.

Yes, other parties rushed into the woke cookies too, but they’re slowly edging backwards. The Greens can’t come back from this. It will haunt them. Sad

OP posts:
BlackeyedGruesome · 02/05/2019 10:54

We have lost the ability to vote in secret as ballot papers are clear visible to anyone passing due to open booths

Outanabout · 02/05/2019 11:09

Irish elections are looming as well. I've read their manifesto and panicked a bit when I saw a heading "Just Transition" but it's about transitioning to renewable energy. I don't like my local Green candidate much, but think I'll hold my nose and vote for him and various People Before Profit candidates. Will question any who show up at my door though Angry

Outanabout · 02/05/2019 11:10

Black eyed, how could anyone see what you've ticked?

TransposersArePosers · 02/05/2019 11:24

Thanks for the info on protest voting.

So if I was to write NONE across the candidates and a vertical line through all the boxes, but then added

WOMAN = ADULT HUMAN FEMALE

on the paper somewhere, do you think that'd get the message across as to why I had no-one to vote for?

DpWm · 02/05/2019 11:33

Transposers
People do see the spoiled papers, I'd think if enough people did the same, if there was say a big feminist rebellion where 1000s all wrote AHF, the message would get through, but on it's own they'd probably just think it was just some extremist thing and not think anything of it.

DpWm · 02/05/2019 11:34

Anyone up for a big feminist voting rebellion?

MockerstheFeManist · 02/05/2019 11:34

Please do not vote UKIP even as a protest.

Batten is a vile racist who has adopted and defended candidates who post tweets about Jess Phillips saying, "I wouldn't even rape her."

BettyDuMonde · 02/05/2019 12:09

The Greens tend to be especially nice people, who care about animals and trees and stuff, but aren’t grounded in class analysis, so it made them especially easy to hijack. One of the local female candidates is currently scaling peak trans before my very eyes, interestingly enough.

The Lib Dems are habitually socially liberal, so they just accepted that this was the next stage of LGBT rights and didn’t give it much thought. They were also easy to hijack.

Labour are a combination of both of the above but with the added problem of some loud mouth SJW influencers (think Evergreen College) and a history of male dominance due to the relationship with industrial unions. Women in Labour and the TU movement have historically been encouraged to meet and organise separately, because sex is a class, but they haven’t always had the results of that organising respected/acted upon.
My local labour branch passed an ‘AWS are for women only’ motion (which currently means bio women and those with a GRC) and I know that most of our women councillors are terves (only the childless ones aren’t!) the problem is, how many of the men are taking them seriously, are they paying more attention to the trendy SJW’s in national politics than they are to actual Labour women on the ground locally? Probably.
Labour look like they’ve been hijacked, but internally, it’s not so clear cut. They need a top level female figure head to snap and blow the top off the pressure cooker - like we are seeing in the SNP. The question is, do any of them have the ovaries to do so? Or are they unwilling to risk their virtue cookies (and more seriously, their physical safety - especially after what happened to Jo Cox)?

I don’t really know any active conservatives, but I suspect the younger ones fit into the Lib Dem way of thinking and the older ones don’t really care much either way and are leaving it to the younger ones to figure out, especially after they got to enjoy the credit for same sex marriage. If they are affluent enough not to be affected much (private schools, private healthcare, private sports facilities, jobs that don’t entail getting changed in the workplace etc) then it’s probably barely on their radar. Doubt many actually believe TWAW though (and they won’t want biological boys in the girls grammar schools and vice versa).

Leavesofgrass · 02/05/2019 13:38

Patrick Jarvie (leader of the Greens in Scotland) has recently convinced me not to vote Green, having recently retweeted a tweet that called Joan McAlpine 'weekly wanker'. Such a crass, insulting way to respond to someone whose views you oppose.

RuffleCrow · 02/05/2019 13:43

I used to be heavily involved in the party.

I'm now (since the Coventry scandal and wokegate generally) ignoring their canvassers and spoiling my ballot paper today (unless there's an interesting independent candidate).

They had some of the best years of my life. I've done my bit. They've fucked it up.

RuffleCrow · 02/05/2019 13:48

Shit. I didn't know about Will Duckworth. Once went for a drink with him. There was something 'off' about him that I couldn't put my finger on. And now I know what it was.

Sunkisses · 02/05/2019 13:50

I could never vote Green either, despite having been an environmentalist all my life. It's not just their bizarre, culty adherence to weirdo, reality-denying 'gender-identity' ideology, nor their dangerous lack of safeguarding, and their nativity about sexism and male violence. But they are absolutely hopeless too. Completely disorganised, and overrun with trans activists who hijacked them about 4 years ago

CurbsideProphet · 02/05/2019 13:53

I only have Labour, UKIP, and Conservatives standing in my area. I'm spoiling my ballot.

popehilarious · 02/05/2019 13:57

Greens weren't v 'science and logic' a few years ago. I always avoided voting Green when they were pro-woo (homeopathy etc). They've gone quiet on that front afaict in the last few years.

Here it's pretty much either them or Tory and I will never vote Tory. I'm optimistic that GC voices will get heard more in future so won't base my entire vote based on that but it's something I intend to challenge them on!

TransposersArePosers · 02/05/2019 14:00

DpWm Yes!!

I've never spoilt a paper or protest voted before, but make a point of always voting for the least worst option as i am grateful to have a vote at all.

I will feel quite the rebel on May23rd. Perhaps I will also wear my AHF hoodie to the polling station!

popehilarious · 02/05/2019 14:01

Non-goady question to ppl spoiling their ballots: what specifically do you think it will achieve? I've been tempted to in the past but hate to be without a voice.

popehilarious · 02/05/2019 14:02

I've read their manifesto and panicked a bit when I saw a heading "Just Transition" but it's about transitioning to renewable energy

Grin
Calledyoulastnightfromglasgow · 02/05/2019 14:02

Patrick Jarvis = awful.

When did he ask me whether I wanted Scottish independence?

FloralBunting · 02/05/2019 14:07

To me, spoiling my ballot is a legitimate form of protest that still engages with the process. I couldn't not go to the polls, I would genuinely feel guilty about disrespecting the people who paid for my freedom to do so. But I can't, in good conscience, but my cross beside any of the political parties standing.

As it happens, I have signed the legally required forms to allow a candidate to stand in my area, and I am quite happy to have done so because a multiplicity of options is a good thing in a democracy. That's different to what I do with my own vote.

RuffleCrow · 02/05/2019 14:09

pope it means election officials and party members at the count will see the spolit papers (if only briefly) and collectively they will need to be agreed by candidates if ambiguous. Where there are a large number of spoilt papers it may give candidates pause for thought.

In local elections winning or losing can boil down to a handful of votes. If you lose by 20 votes and there are 25 spoilt ballot papers it may make candidates reflect that someone would take the time to go into a polling station and yet not find anyone they can bring themselves to vote for. Better chance of that than simply staying at home anyway.

popehilarious · 02/05/2019 14:14

I read the 'vote none' link above - so the spoiled votes get counted, might be on the news if they're huge, but meanwhile everything continues as usual and the person with most votes wins... Unless there's enough momentum of spoiled votes that the political process changes significantly... Is that the hoped-for outcome?
The system is patently inadequate and you're never going to find a party that represents exactly what you think about everything. But to me it feels like an option for people that don't want to make a difficult decision but want to feel like they've 'done something'. I don't know... I'm just musing out loud really and can totally understand the frustration when really important issues come into conflict.

popehilarious · 02/05/2019 14:16

Crossed post - yes in cases of small numbers I can see it would make local politicians listen. But that's still in small numbers!

Xiaoxiong · 02/05/2019 14:22

OP is the independent in your area no good? There's a big movement in my area to have an independent "borough first!" non-party political party which seems like a good idea.

FloralBunting · 02/05/2019 14:23

Yes, small numbers. But there's no substantial difference between that and voting for a small party or candidate unlikely to succeed. We all make our choices hopefully through much consideration, and, it being politics there are any number of opinions on the matter.

I can't think of a party that does not have a deal breaking element for me right now. I know that voting is often about compromise. But sometimes that just isn't possible - were I American I would have voted neither Trump or Clinton.

Most votes are pretty impotent in our set up, sadly, which is why turn out is so low so often. But if there are spoiled ballots, from people who obviously were not apathetic and went to the polling station, that's one way of trying to get a voice heard.

WinterBluez · 02/05/2019 15:04

I spoiled my ballot, just couldn't bring myself to vote for any of them. There's plenty of people who don't vote because they can't be bothered or simply don't care. I'm not one of those people, so I felt it was important to go, but at the same time, I'm not putting a cross in a box for anyone who isn't going to stand up for what's important.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.