I'm not unsympathetic to what the writer is saying, but TS have not demonstrate any concern for the impact their presence had in female spaces.
This.
When you look at threads where this has been extensively discussed with TS MNetters, it is mostly about where the line for gate keeping should be and it is inevitably based on self interest - that some male born people, who have done 'enough' to transition, should have the right to use women only spaces. And those MNetters feel their wishes and needs to use those spaces are more important than women's needs for single sex spaces and the women who will be excluded by their presence.
As a very wise poster here has said before, it's merely about the position of the boot on women's necks. It's still males, agreeing among themselves, what a woman is, who can be one, and informing women of their decision. It absolutely represents a male belief of women being subordinate.
When this was a tiny number of people with gate keeping, yes, it didn't cause a visible problem. There still will have been women who have quietly left women only spaces and politely didn't show their exclusion. That door has now been forced wide. Women are having to fight for the right to be a separate recognised entity and to justify to the last decimal place any requests for dignity, privacy and safety - and I'm sorry, at this point I'm now entirely behind the needs of women, for women, by women. Males are going to have to sort out their own services and meet their own needs; we have enough problems. We can't do the caretaking for them too.