I enjoyed reading Renee's opinion on this, and I appreciate her speaking up.
I disagree with her though on whether the deciding factor on whether or not a transwoman can compete in the women's category should be either a) surgery and/or b) whether or not they will win. Although I understand why Renee feels that way, it's not a consistent position. A 20-year old male athlete could have GR surgery and still wipe the floor with every female. Renee seems to be suggesting that the rules should allow them to compete, but that the transwoman should (due to morals) not compete until they are older and not as competitive. That is clearly open to abuse. Renee themself did unfairly beat lots of women at age 40+.
To me, this demonstrates how Renee's perspective is influenced by a male-entitlement to women. Women, of all abilities, deserve to compete in women's sports with only female people, because that is what they signed up for (whether that be at their local tennis club match, or at the Olympics). If you have a segregated male/female event, all the people in it have the right to expect that it be actually segregated by male/female.
It reinforces my belief that no male(-born) human, whether man, transexual, transgender, or intersex, should have their opinion on opening up women's sports (to males) taken into account, because they are not considering the best interests of women.