Oh my god! These questions / statements just show a complete inability to engage with coherent or rational thought.
For instance: ‘I have the right to judge other people’.
What does that even mean? Is it asking me if I think I am a judge, either of a mags court or a tribunal or the high court or the court of appeal or Supreme Court? Presumably not.
So what does it mean? Presumably: ‘I have the right to draw conclusions about whether another person’s behaviour is appropriate, kind, reasonable, constructive, moral or sensible’. (I can’t think of anything else.)
But who on earth would disagree with this? We judge in this sense every time we engage with another human being. We can’t help it. That is what being human is: we decide who we like or don’t like, who we’re frightened of, who we love, who we want to spend time with, who to trust, who to avoid, on the basis of their manner and behaviour, their words and their works, and our judgement of these.
Judging others enables us to make friends, to take lovers, to vote for political parties, to support our children in their journey to adulthood, and to campaign against the evils we see around us. A life without judgment would be a life of social vacancy and moral idiocy.
We’re encouraged to be discreet, generally, about our negative social judgements, just out of tact and common sense and kindness, but that isn’t what this is getting at, is it?
The people who wrote this couldn’t think their way out of a paper bag. Which isn’t their fault, but inflicting their numbheadedness on the public really is. I am despairing. Stupidity prancing around on stilts.