Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

LGBT Foundation - one of many charities to jump on the publicly funded trans gravy chain

6 replies

PeeGreen · 16/03/2019 00:27

The LGBT Foundation was until 2015 the Lesbian & Gay Foundation.

As LGF, they were in 2012 awarded £300k over 4 years for lesbian and bisexual women's health under the Big Lottery Reaching Communities programme. www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/funding/grants/0030119242

After adding the T they got another Big Lottery Reaching Communities award, but strictly For 'T'. As T is apparently 60% more important than L, the award was £500k.

www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/funding/grants/0031023355

In 2017 the lesbian project was renewed at the higher level of £387,000

www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/funding/grants/0031045025

But it's not for all lesbians, it's for 'those who are typically difficult to engage with, including ... trans women.'

About 1.7% of women are lesbian or bisexual, and maybe 0.1% of the UK is transgender, so in reality the funding per person is much, much higher.

What's the outcome of this public funding?

This 'T' health report was produced with Lottery Cash

s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/lgbt-media/Files/acd2bcc5-a2d4-4203-8e22-aed9f4843921/TransformingOutcomesLGBTFdn.pdf

It reports

" 97% reported at least one negative outcome related to binding including back pain (53.8%), shortness of breath (46.6%) and bad posture (40.3%). The study found that binding often was most consistently associated with negative health outcomes"

Despite this, the LGBT Foundation funds breast binding and is proud to provide children with binders without their parents' knowledge.

lgbt.foundation/news/in-the-end-equality-wins/249

They worked with Penis News to promote breast binding on this video

www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/03/15/how-to-use-a-binder-safely-a-transgender-and-non-binary-guide/

It is obvious that T represents a huge business opportunity for charities to provide new 'services' and seek public funds (and those of woke business such as Lloyds Bank) for them.

And of course these services need to be marketed to potential clients. If you don't have any 13 year old girls binding their breasts then they will won't get any funding.

OP posts:
theOtherPamAyres · 16/03/2019 02:44

When I looked at this organisation some months ago, I was struck by the fact that core funding comes from the councils and NHS trusts in Greater Manchester.

Lottery and other grants are the 'cherries on the top' for specific projects, I think.

When I perused the website on that occasion, I raised an eyebrow at some of the events because they didn't seem to tackle the problems that the Foundation claims to tackle (ie health). For instance, there was a monthly group meeting to explore fetishes.

I checked the upcoming 'women's programme' and there were no events planned. In contrast, there were loads of events in the 'mens programme' and the 'trans programme'. It looked like a gay man and trans social club rather than a health charity.

Had I lived in one of the cities or boroughs of Greater Manchester, I would have buttonholed a few councillors to explain why they thought the Foundation deserved a slice of local taxes.

I suspect that councils rely on their in-house LGBT advisers to assure them that the Foundation is doing a worthwhile job, rather than scrutinising their Annual Report themselves.

ThePurportedDoctoress · 16/03/2019 10:18

Just linking this recent thread on diversity training.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3530868-Diversity-training-whos-benefiting

It is extraordinary how much money and resources are being spent on such a small group. And with zero scrutiny - taxpayers are funding reports that use definitions lifted from Urban Dictionary.

zanahoria · 16/03/2019 11:30

Some top quality research here, these organizations need to be held to account. This so much going wrong but public funds for breast binding? I shall read the rest of the links when I have calmed down a bit.

zanahoria · 18/03/2019 08:07

Olivia Butterworth of the LGBT Foundation on the primark changing rooms debate

she does not beleive there should be one

pbs.twimg.com/media/D12aJhNWwAAUOV5?format=png

ThePurportedDoctoress · 18/03/2019 15:00

LGBT Foundation ran a survey last year as part of their "annual health campaign for lesbian and bisexual women". They include part-time women in their definition of lesbian and bisexual women. What exactly is the point of research like this? What the hell is Professor Catherine Meads doing getting involved in the erasure of lesbian women?

lgbt.foundation/news/national-sexual-wellbeing-survey-2018-women-who-have-sex-with-women/213

"National Sexual Wellbeing Survey 2018: Women Who Have Sex With Women

What is this survey?

This survey is part of LGBT Foundation’s Women’s Programme research into the sexual wellbeing of women who have sex with women.

"Sexual Wellbeing" within this research means 'a state of physical, emotional, mental and social wellbeing in relation to sexuality; it is not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction or infirmity. Sexual [wellbeing] requires a positive and respectful approach to sexuality and sexual relationships, as well as the possibility of having pleasurable and safe sexual experiences, free of coercion, discrimination and violence' (World Health Organisation, 2018).

The sections in this survey will cover topics such as wellbeing, confidence, communication, pleasure, behaviour, exploration and access to services.

This survey will run between August and November 2018 and will be followed by national focus groups. The results will be released in a report and shared with the wider community, service providers, media nationally.

This survey should take around 20 minutes to complete.

Who is this survey for?

This research is inclusive of people who identify as women – all or part of the time - including trans women, non-binary people and gender fluid people who identify as lesbian, bisexual or are questioning their sexual orientation or who do not identify in this way but do have sex, or intend to have sex, with women.

This survey is aimed at women from all backgrounds, including black women, women of colour, disabled women, older women, women who are parents or currently pregnant, women engaged in sex work, women from travelling communities, migrant women, women seeking asylum and who are refugees, and women with no access to public funds.

Why are we conducting this research?

This research is a priority now as there is a lack of up-to-date national evidence on sexual wellbeing for lesbian and bisexual women and other women who have sex with women. Previous research in this area took a more clinical approach to sexual health but excluded other factors including pleasure, exploration, health, access to services, confidence, and consent.

The data we gather will provide us with a greater understanding of your needs, and will inform the design of our services as well as influencing policy and support for women nationally."

Cismyfatarse1 · 18/03/2019 15:20

What about transmen who have sex with women? Are they not included (again) because they are not women?

or who do not identify in this way but do have sex, or intend to have sex, with women. .......Heterosexual men?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page