Hi, has anyone who works for a large organisation that records employees’ protected characteristics (to avoid discrimination, etc) objected to their only recording/monitoring ‘gender’ not actual biological sex (which of course is a protected characteristic, while gender isn’t)? If so, how did you frame this? Any suggestions for wording/points?
I can’t see how my organisation can possibly assess the sex pay gap and female participation at senior management levels unless it records sex, but no, it is only interested in gender, and since the organisation is very woke, what people declare for ‘gender’ may well not accord with their biological sex.