So, having read their opinion piece in the Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-support-a-political-party-that-is-marginalizing-me-out-of-existence/2019/01/08/cc153f18-1373-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.html?utm_term=.908352d33683
I was curious about the stats that they were reporting based on this
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-Final.pdf
I see that it's a much higher response group than the reports that Stonewall usually uses and I see that they specifically comment on the role that mental health plays in the higher figures and the difficulties which how respondents answer written questions on suicide (I think it implies that the wording of the question results in a higher than anticipated positive response to suicide attempts but could be wrong in my interpretation).
I can't help but wonder how suicide attempt is defined and the impact that this would have on the statistics. Surely such a high attempt % would result in a higher outcome of actual deaths ? Why do these reports only talk about attempts and not outcomes ?
And for the sake of those reading who will willfully misinterpret the above comments by me, no, I don't want transpeople attempting or succeeding at suicide. I don't want transpeople to suffer from discrimination. I don't want them to experience mental distress or suffering. I don't really want to have to highlight the issue at all but when it's being used as a tactic by pressure groups, in my opinion wrongly and to deliberately create an emotive response to trans ideology, it's only fair that we're able to examine the issue.
I have no comments on the actual article other than to wonder what
this crap means Femininity is my true north. Nah, Jen, femininity is a prison.