From the article: “When asked about the potential conflict of rights between trans and non-trans women in July 2017, Miller told Janice Turner: “But 50 years ago, maybe ten years ago, people felt very uncomfortable about gay people showing their relationships in public but life has moved on.” That was the line: only a bigot would not back her report.”
I think that’s a very strange response from someone who you would expect to be intelligent like a government minister, because I see very little equivalence in terms of what the old gay rights movement wanted and what the modern trans rights movement are asking for.
As far as I understand it the old gays rights movement asked for gay people to have the same legal rights as everyone else which barely affected anyone in society other than themselves. They weren’t asking that the government require anyone else in society to give up anything or do anything differently as far as I remember. At least not on any large scale.
But as far as I understand it what the trans rights movement are asking for is that society be changed so that gender segregated spaces and the like are opened to anyone who says they are of that gender which affects everyone who doesn’t believe that simply identifying as a gender makes you that gender. Either that or they want the rules and current norms around gender abolished all together so there are no spaces segregated by sex and no all women’s short lists and the like but again that affects everyone? Surely a change like that cannot be granted in a democracy without the government first checking that the public are by enlarge onboard or at least OKwith it, and I’m really not sure they are. They might be, but I’m not sure they are.
What am I missing here? There has got to be more to it than just this surely? We are talking about a response from a government minister here, not the counter point raised in the sixth form debating society.