I'm very concerned about the way feminists who believe in full body autonomy for pregnant women begin to suspend that principle when they perceive a competing right to take precedence.
It's a foot in the door technique designed to undermine a principle which should be universal.
If you believe that every woman deserves
-all information relating to her pregnancy conveyed to her as her right
- sovereignty over her body and decisions
then you accept that she will terminate her pregnancy in circumstances in which you would not and you fight for her right to do that.
One cannot argue that women must have pregnancy information withheld, to prevent informed decisions, or that certain of her reasons for terminating are wrong and she must be forced to continue with those pregnancies.
Forcing individual women to bear the brunt of an unwanted pregnancy in service or duty to a wider political or social cause isn't compatible with believing women should have unquestioned bodily autonomy.
There are billions of born females for us to focus on saving and protecting. Any movement to force them to bear unwanted girls (and their reasons will be many, for some including a risk of severe life-threatening retribution if they fail to hear a son) will not improve their lives, nor will it help women in general.
The problem is not women terminating their pregnancies.
It is the society in which they are not free or safe to make their own reproductive choices.
Let's fix that, and the problem will resolve itself.