Ok so tell if if I'm wrong but:
- if you identify as non-binary aren't you just a non-conforming person who doesn't conform to societies perceptions of being male or female?
-if you are a man dressing as a woman or a woman dressing as a man you are a transvestite?
-if you are a man wanting to be and live as a woman or a woman wanting to be a man you are transsexual not transgender? Do you have to want to change gender (not sex) to have a heterosexual relationship to be transsexual?
I find labelling something in a new way is just trying to repackage it and make it cool or fashionable and it betrays the reality and the misogyny at its roots.
Transsexuals have been quietly living their lives (whether they support self ID or not) and all these TRAs all just seem to me to be screaming for attention and making stuff up to make life difficult for everyone, mainly women of course.
What is actually wrong with saying a transwoman is a transwoman and a transman is a transman as this is respectful to both their born sex and feelings of gender and the journey they must go one etc...and there's nothing wrong with this. There will be more all-in-one public toilets for one (or will there?)...
I don't support self ID and am deeply concerned about safeguarding and frankly what are kids are now being taught in schools as it appears that science is no longer the basis for sex education according to some recent threads here. My son is a Pre schooler so I'm just hoping that this will be old fashioned in a few years and we can revert back to saying a boy has a penis and a girl has a vagina.
I'm scratching around for positives but having seen a video on our growing population today I wonder if all these children and young people who transition grow up sterile there will be increased adoptions and fewer natural births which would have a positive impact in our planet in time.
I know that's an odd train of thought but it's where I am with this whole debate right now!