I know many have strong views about Butterfly. Something that really stood out to me was the assumption that the boy was actually gay, and the resulting abuse. Something I can relate to after being assumed a lesbian as a kid, definitely a tomboy, now happily married with DH but would be as happy either way. Everything from the dad beating him for dancing around in a skirt and pink top, snide comments from boys in class, insults for preferring to join girls dancing than play football with the lads. The grandad hit the nail on the head saying he might be gay but so what. In real life I've witnessed similar boys labelled as homo, freak, poof, pervert, weirdo, myriad of slurs that re-inforce deviating from masculine roles is not acceptable.
Honestly it amazes me schools turn a blind eye to homophobic bullying or even GNC boys isolation but encourage children to change gender. That boy eventually felt his only escape was to jump on the trans bandwagon and its no wonder so many kids are doing likewise. I don't even mean homosexual activity as adults which was the thrust behind Section 28 (which I campaigned against with all the vigour current id laws are being opposed), just its no big deal if boys want to 'act like a girl' and to say otherwise is only driving the trans ideology.
It is an ideal world that boys could wear dresses, like pink and sparkles, have long hair, dance instead of play football, whatever 'effeminate' characters and not get bullied at home or at school, but for me this is the root of the trans problem and more feasible than the legal fiction a child can change sex and get sterilised and mutilated.