For the very specific focus of the thread, no, I think the Asher's case has highlighted that you cannot be compelled to use certain language. I'd be prepared to go to the wire on that one.
Wrt to the point brought up about calling White 'she' to highlight the bankruptcy of the 'no true transwoman' obfuscation, yes, it's a good first step in the argument, but you have to follow it up with the point that accepting White as a woman is the consequence of self ID, because otherwise it's really confusing to the newbie.
I totally agree that it's a devastating point to highlight that women are not women based on how morally good they are, and you can't lose your 'membership of the club' by doing a bad thing and AWAs need to own that.
But the reason White is not accepted into the 'woman club' is because it's not a club you join, it is a sex you are born into, and White wasn't. The kind of person they are, the way they see themselves, the lies they have told, the things they have done are irrelevant. One of the reasons we oppose self ID because it leads to some men taking the opportunity to abuse women. A man who self declares that he is a woman does not, by dint of his magical pronouncement, cease to be as much of a possible risk as when he was 'legally' a man.
Follow through to the logical end, otherwise there are going to be vulnerable women hearing GC feminists saying Karen White is a woman and getting very upset indeed.