Weirdly, I saw a Reddit post recently where a trans identifying male born person posted about their new, bespoke ‘bottom surgery’ - they had a ‘vaginaplasty’ but had retained their penis. Photographs were provided,
This went down well with commentators, many of whom expressed an interest in a similar outcome for themselves,
How this is legally justified under current treatment pathways, I cannot fathom, but I suppose it’s the logical realisation of the theoretical concept of being ‘non binary’?
Surgical risks are presumably smaller than in accepted SRS but how an outcome like this could be desireable for anything other than fetishistic reasons is currently beyond me.