Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

did the webchat with the NSPCC go ahead?

13 replies

traceyracer · 02/09/2018 00:40

I heard there was going to be one but not when

OP posts:
gendercritter · 02/09/2018 00:44

No, they bailed!

traceyracer · 02/09/2018 00:54

why?

OP posts:
WomblingWoman · 02/09/2018 00:57

There's a thread already on this on FWR - NSPCC is in the title.

HavingALittleBabyToolshed · 02/09/2018 01:09

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/mumsnet_facebook_live/3343961-Facebook-Live-about-talking-to-kids-about-staying-safe-from-abuse-with-NSPCC?pg=17&order=

I think it is page SEVEN that has their press release.

SPOFS · 02/09/2018 02:07

The silly mummies didn't ask the right questions.

WomblingWoman · 02/09/2018 02:20

Yes - they talked about balls rather than SPOF's ;-)

Treasure114 · 02/09/2018 09:07

SPOFS Grin

Pathetic behaviour from the NSPCC, really disappointing.

LemonJello · 02/09/2018 09:51

Yes, The NSPCC doesn’t consider there to be specific child protection concerns in relation to trans-inclusive policies

And we know this must be true because they explained the extensive consultation process they went through in order to assess these policies, then they took time to answer all our questions, patiently explaining how they were in fact unfounded.

Oh wait. No they didn’t. Even though,if there are no safeguarding concerns, it should be easy to explain why not, NSPCC declined to do this and instead ran away and hid from the terrible terrible mummies.

speakingwoman · 02/09/2018 09:53

Holy crap that thread is quite something.

loveyouradvice · 02/09/2018 17:22

Hi ... no radio silence from NSPCC.... I hope they are really beginning to think...

If you want to help encourage them, do post on AIBU both to flag up to NSPCC and to others who won't yet be aware

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/3353658-AIBU-to-be-shocked-that-the-NSPCC-cancelled-their-Facebook-Live-session-with-Mumsnetters-because-they-didnt-like-the-questions-That-they-cant-explain-why-they-arent-putting-children-in-danger

tiredandweary · 02/09/2018 19:00

For all the posters dismissing these issues as transphobia, here's a court judgement about child J who was repeatedly emotionally abused because social workers listened to trans groups rather than schools and other professionals who were concerned that J (a boy) was not a transgender girl as his mother claimed but in fact a boy.

It's really interesting as it details the process and how those social workers with the legal responsibilities for protecting him failed abysmally as they followed the mantra from trans groups (Mermaids) rather than looking at the real harm being done to him by his (mentally unwell) mother. It's a sobering example of what happens when professionals fail to centre children and follow the false ideologies of some trans groups. It's long but nails the problem!

www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/2430.html

UpstartCrow · 02/09/2018 19:19

There's a thread on AIBU which shows how cautious many people feel about mixed sex sleepovers.

BlinkingHeckWA · 02/09/2018 21:47

@tiredandweary

  • Thank you for posting about the case. It is very sad.
New posts on this thread. Refresh page