Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trans woman angry after being treated like a er... woman

41 replies

AuroraFloyd · 21/07/2018 20:37

A pharmacist refused to fill the hormone prescription and humiliated the customer.

This trans woman got to experience real life as a woman and didn't like it.

edition-m.cnn.com/2018/07/20/health/arizona-trans-woman-cvs-pharmacist-prescription-trnd/index.html

The pharmicist has been fired and yet this happens on a regular basis to women who want emergency contraception. Or who try to buy certain medications while pregnant or breastfeeding - even if it's not for them. How many times have I seen the pharmacists defended by employers because of their beliefs but when it happens to someone with a penis it's a sackable offence!

OP posts:
AngryAttackKittens · 21/07/2018 22:48

No, madam, it's really not their job to get into 15 minute arguments with young women about whether or not their period symptoms are severe enough to justify buying an over the counter medication.

Bumbungo · 21/07/2018 22:51

Pharmacists challenge presciptions all the time, especially in hospital pharmacies. Junior doctors in particular frequently make (lethal) errors in prescribing and it is absolutely the pharmacist's job to ensure that the correct dose is dispensed.

I have been refused the MAP from a GP due to religious beliefs. The justification given is that if they do precribe and it failed, then they would be obliged to authorise the next step: abortion.

It was rather frustrating but I was advised to go to the Family Planning Clinic so it wasn't as though I was left without options. I'm ok with it generally, inconvenient though it was. I wouldn't be if it removed my having access to the medication/procedure entirely obviously.

OlennasWimple · 21/07/2018 22:52

I agree, the decision over what to prescribe is between a patient and their doctor. The pharmacist has no business deciding whether or not that decision is correct.

No - pharmacists have a vital role in ensuring that the correct prescription has been written, both in the UK and in the US. Google "medication error" for details, but don't discount pharmacists as some kind of bean counters who just put the pills in the pots on request

The pharmacist also needs to ensure that the prescription meets the rules of the NHS (in the UK) or the insurance company (UK or particularly US). One of my family members has to take a very expensive medicine because he has serious reactions to the more commonly prescribed, significantly cheaper alternative. About 1/3 times he has taken the prescription to be filled, he has to wait while they phone the GP surgery to confirm that X is to be dispensed, not Y. Similarly, I was prescribed retinoids in the US to treat my acne, but I could never get it filled the same day, I always had to return two days later to collect it because as well as treating acne it can be used for cosmetic purposes (reducing wrinkles) and the insurance company would cover the medical use but not the cosmetic use, and insisted on authorising every single dispensing of the drug.

So yes, the pharmacist was right to pause on whether the correct prescription had been written (female hormones for an obviously male patient; first time ever getting this prescription). But they should have spoken discreetly to the patient and / or called the doctor to confirm that it was correct. It's not a conversation to be had in public in front of other customers

AngryAttackKittens · 21/07/2018 22:56

I have been refused the MAP from a GP due to religious beliefs. The justification given is that if they do precribe and it failed, then they would be obliged to authorise the next step: abortion.

Again I'd say that their beliefs are not an acceptable justification for refusing to do the job for which they were hired. I mean, great that you were able to get it sorted out via a referral, but given that MAP is time sensitive really not appropriate or patient friendly to be adding extra steps that take extra time.

TellsEveryoneRealFacts · 21/07/2018 23:06

just 6 weeks ago, at the tesco pharmacy in uttoxeter, the pharmacist reuse to sell me 1% hydrocortisone cream - right after they sold a man the same cream with NO questioning, until i asked if they really wanted me to get my breasts out - which was where the rash was - in front of the gathered audience in the middle of the shop.

fucking arseholes - and yes women are treated differently to men.

NicoAndTheNiners · 21/07/2018 23:09

My local chemist also,refuses to let me have phenegan which is an over the counter anti histamine. He’s told me to go and get it prescribed as he thinks (rightly) there’s other stuff I can take for my hay fever.

I don’t have hay fever, I take it to knock me out. But I now go to Tesco and they don’t bat an eyelid.

AngryAttackKittens · 21/07/2018 23:10

One year DH and I both caught the flu and ended up buying stuff for it separately since we both did so on our lunch breaks at work. I got quizzed about why I was buying 2 different types (because I want something to help me sleep at night and don't want something that will make me sleepy during the day, you idiot), he did not.

Bumbungo · 21/07/2018 23:11

I understand your point Angry but I am personally ok with medical people having an ethical / religious position on such matters as long as the women is referred to an alternative facility who will be able to accomodate it.

Logistically, it could well be a hard call, I agree.

AngryAttackKittens · 21/07/2018 23:17

Especially for patients who have a hard time getting the time off work/away from other responsibilities to attend multiple appointments, or for whom how to get to those appointments is an issue in terms of time, cost, availability, etc.

I feel like religious people need to park their beliefs at the door when they go into work or, if they are unable or unwilling to do that, not pursue careers where that's likely to be an issue. Like if you really want to be a doctor but are absolutely unwilling to provide any service that in your opinion is adjacent to abortion become a podiatrist, or an ear nose and throat specialist, or even a dentist.

LassWiADelicateAir · 22/07/2018 00:14

I understand your point Angry but I am personally ok with medical people having an ethical / religious position on such matters as long as the women is referred to an alternative facility who will be able to accomodate it

There is no justification for taking on a job like this and refusing to dispense a legal, prescribed drug.

LaSquirrel · 22/07/2018 04:25

Quite a few women in the UK have been refused the MAP and OCP on the basis it 'offends' the (male!) pharmacist. I believe it is still part of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society guidelines. From the DailyFail article linked above (woman trying to obtain MAP):

"It would appear on the face of it that the pharmacist was operating within the bounds of the code of ethics and standards set out by the RPS - which states that where a pharmacist's religious beliefs prevent them from providing a service, they must advise patients of alternative sources for the service requested."

It frequently happens after hours or weekends, with few other local alternatives in many cases. Frankly, if 'religious beliefs' are to be upheld in this way, then those pharmacists should not be permitted to work on those shifts. They can suffer for their religious beliefs, not the clients.

LaSquirrel · 22/07/2018 04:27

As for being treated like a woman - that is what they wanted, isn't it? The problem is, being raised as male, they think women are just making up shit, and when similar happens, they think it is 'transphobia', rather than run of the mill, misogyny.

PeakPants · 22/07/2018 05:26

God that pisses me off so much. Why should a woman have to trek to another pharmacy just because a MAN has some idiotic belief that it’s morally wrong to prescribe a tablet to make some cells detach and exit the body? You truly have to be living on some different planet to believe that one day after conception there is a sacred life there and if you won’t dispense, it should be YOUR responsibility to ensure that someone else on the presmises will. Not to send the woman away to god knows where.
Fucks me off big time and I bet most of the objectors are indeed men. Fuck the fuck off.

Newmanwannabe · 22/07/2018 05:33

I remember being public ally questioned and humiliated when I tried to buy some diflucan, they refused to sell it because I hadn’t tried cream first. Even though I know how best to manage thrush in my vagina. It is available over the counter. They should not have to drill you infront of other customers. I complained later I don’t think it went anywhere though

SilverBirchTree · 22/07/2018 06:14

Um, it's not ok for anyone to be treated like this by a pharmacist.

Good on that woman for standing up for herself and other women, who as you say, have a history of being denied medical care.

LassWiADelicateAir · 22/07/2018 08:37

God that pisses me off so much. Why should a woman have to trek to another pharmacy just because a MAN has some idiotic belief that it’s morally wrong to prescribe a tablet to make some cells detach and exit the body?

Don't assume it was a man. One of the links here refers to he, one just to pharmacists. I've found other reports where female pharmacists have refused. Opinion polls in UK generally show more opposition to abortion by women than men.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread