Let's play with an idea.
The government has created legislation over decades that protects women.
The foundation of those women's rights is this:
Women are biologically distinguishable in real life from men.
We are mammals, women are female, men are male.
This is a matter of material fact.
We are therefore recognised in law, as a biological category distinct from men.
We have been, as a biological group, first denied, and then granted rights as a biological category, based on our real life, biological existence as distinguishable from men.
The law now seeks to redress specific injustices (like 'women' being denied the vote etc)
The word 'women' is used in all such legislation - but CRUCIALLY - is NOT defined explicitly as 'adult human female'. Possibly because the law can be sloppy, and also because it is so implicit that all references to 'women' in these laws, are without question references to biological females.
Also, these laws refer to righting the wrongs effected upon that exact same target group - biological females.
Those laws were and are for females.
(The word SEX is also not explicitly defined, nor is FEMALE despite being referred to multiple times. These concepts, I believe, were considered obvious beyond question)
Then, the Equality Act 2010 explicitly makes SEX a protected characteristic. And it lays out how it is legal for the SEX women to EXCLUDE men, in order to be monitored as a discrete group; to measure inequality; to seek redress for discrimination.
BUT.
The government then creates a conflict situation by introducing the circular concept 'gender' into law which to all intents and purposes is literally "false sex'.
It also takes the implicit meaning of 'woman' ( biological female ) and alters it, to become explicitly divorced from sex. All the laws intended to protect biological females now instantly belong to both sexes, and it is legally impossible for the law to recognise females as distinct from males.
So laws for females have instantly altered to become laws for both sexes.
It dissolves female rights in one fell swoop.
And the very foundation of redress for equality, which is the right to be recognised as a group that EXCLUDES MALES, for the purpose of being COMPARED to males, has been eliminated.
It distils all references to being of the female biological sex into one remaining exemption clause of the Equality Act. And then it issues contradictory guidance which makes it abundantly clear that there is a head-on conflict between REAL SEX and GENDER (false sex) and that false sex can trump real sex for most practical purposes.
It has made female SEX rights unenforceable.
They were there, and then they were gone.
I believe the UK government has failed to protect the human rights of its female population. It has first legally acknowledged our existence as a biological sex. Recognised the injustices we face as a biological group. Introduced rights specifically for us as a biological sex. And then, it has unilaterally removed all of our rights as a biological sex.
And it has publicly announced its support for 'false sex' and for the further downgrading of 'actual sex' to the point that asserting one's intention to defend one's human rights is potentially a 'hate crime'.
I am not a lawyer, as you can probably tell!
But it seems to me to explicitly recognise a group of humans as discrete, and to acknowledge their need for specific rights as that discrete group, but then to remove their right to recognition as that group, is to deny them access to all the rights they were originally granted.
Do we have a case to sue the government for comprehensibly eliminating human rights for females?