Oh and I just re-read the OP and realised it says:
"Womanhood is merely biological."
Merely?
Since when is female boilogy "merely".
If there must be a hierarchy, a gauge, a contest, a measuring up, then of the two sexes, the female one is surely the less "mere". Our bodies can go through a hell of a lot in a lifetime, 3 stages of life rather than two, monthly bleeding, and for most there's pregnancy, maybe childbirth, BF. There is nothing "mere" about the female body.
And on top of that, while men get to see their bodies as a simple tool, a method to transport their consciousness around, girls are lumbered with not only the biological reproductive issues, but also a desire in society to judge us, to see us as a selcection of body parts to be leered at, judged, pursued. This leads us to being painfully aware of our bodies (generalisation) and if surveys are to be believed, mostly fundamentally unhappy with and even detached from them, for long periods of time.
But no, it's merely a female body, not important, not nearly as important as someon'es internal feelings, and definitely not important enough to act as a locator of similarity across a group. There is no need to have a name for cunty people as a group - why would there be? The mere cuntiness is irrelevant to anything to do with anything.