NotTerfNorCis
Also language.
Hiding the debate under niche terms that sound irrelevant. Who would think self-id for trans people or GRA reform merited investigation?
Muddying terms to hide passing a law meaning any man could become a woman. Once you believe 'transwomen are women' and have swallowed the massively wide definition of the transumbrella you have basically accepted that premise. But never actually analysed it rationally.
Once you have that established, you can frame pro-women's rights arguments as 'anti trans'. Which they are not.
Making transphobic a catch all term for ever questioning the lie that a man can actually physically become a woman.
Then extending transphobic to include DBS checks, FGM, calling out male violence in anyone who self-identifies as trans (so any man who decides to say he is a woman).
Dissolve the language and the real story appears.