"Despite the persistent invocation of assault-focused opposition to trans rights, there is little (if any) evidence that cisgender men use those rights to commit crime. "
Actually there is such evidence (although they could be being sneaky and saying that those who claim to be transgender, if they commit crime, aren't then cisgender men commiting the crime...).
Nope, if they claim it doesn't exist, it doesn't exist, obviously!
"While reforming the 2004 Act may not reduce the instance of male-pattern violence, neither would it assist nor encourage the commission of such violence." This is a really sneakysentence again -- if it doesn't reduce it then logically, what are the other alternatives? It either stays the same or increases. They then claim it would neither assist nor encourage an increase, despite evidence that it does (taking changing rooms as an example, and see pattern of offences in the US), or indeed commonsense indicating that it obviously makes it easier! Nope, men who want to offend are obviously too stupid to realise this makes their life easier, and will never notice................
As regards single-sex exceptions (such as no transwomen in rape counselling sessions for example), they claim that "In practice, however, Schedules 3 and 23 are (at least in certain public sectors) rarely applied." Which you could read as -- we have already scared people into believing they can't do this, or shouldn't do this , and even scary Millwall gave in, so give up now laydees and stop objecting!
And a quick skim seems to show no appreciation at all of the issue that women just saying they just don't want penises in female-only spaces is legitimate -- by not even mentioning it, we are not even just dismissed as bigots, but dismissed totally, our 'opinions' are so worthless they don't even need to be mentioned, they just pretend our opinions (and us) just don't exist at all.....................
I just spotted: "while also appreciating that trans women pose no threat in female-only spaces" -- well, we have evidence that some already do plus the bloody obvious that a convicted rapist who then claims they are trans is a threat in a female-only space, and given that we have examples of such, pretending they don't exist is just a big fat lie! Or they are sneakily hiding under the 'they're not true trans, hence it's cismales being the problem again', whilst simultaneously removing any machinery for trying to differentiate between true trans and the liars.....................
Just there is no evidence, your fears are groundless, they are no threat, your objections are wrong, your fears are wrong, it never happens, your opinion and your wants are wrong, you are wrong repeated ad infinitum.