I think it’s tricky, because one of the reasons that feminists are on the back foot with this is that the crux of the problem is very nuanced and fairly academic / intellectual, features which do not play as well as unfocused emotion on social media (which sadly is the main conduit for ideas at the moment).
On the one hand you’ve got trendy, woke, performative liberalism, and on the other a bunch of people questioning such things as whether the concept of trans can even exist, in boringly intellectual terms.
I had never even heard the term “social construct” until the first year of my anthropology degree, and I think the subtleties of the feminist position on trans vs the TRA / lib fem position are difficult to realise without understanding some of these concepts. You can slip a fag paper between the idea that gender is a set of social constructs that should be dismantled and the idea that there are 75+ different gender identities, in terms of the real life understanding of these concepts by their advocates.
The sad thing about all this is that I think we’re all almost on the same page, but that a wedge has been driven between the two ideologies (largely due to the unthinking extremism and misogyny of the TRAs) that is making the gap ever wider.
Unless you understand the subtleties though, there doesn’t (superficially) appear to be much of a difference between being gender critical and “non-binary”. I think this is a fundamental problem for us - the other side is framing the debate in simplistic, social media-friendly terms and making it all too easy to perpetuate the idea that gender critical = bigoted TERF.
To really “get” the rad fem position, you have to have some understanding of the patriarchy and how it oppresses, the Male Gaze, structuralism, Marxism etc etc. That’s a pretty tough sell on twitter.