One of the things that bothers me most is when someone (sane) on Twitter defines womanhood by biology or xx chromosomes or possession of a vagina, and the TRAs immediately pounce and say, "oh so you're reducing a woman to her chromosomes! You're basically saying she's a walking vagina. That's so misogynistic!"
Well, no, the fact that anyone would say that suggests a really basic lack of understanding of how language works or a massive streak of disingenuousness.
It doesn't reduce a woman to her vagina or chromosomes anymore than calling Donald Trump a president means he is restricted to being merely 'head of state'. He's also old, fat, an arsehole, a misogynist, racist, orange, rich, a father, a husband and stupid.
A woman can be many other things as well, and the joy of language is that we have the words to describe those other things.
Woman is a biological term. It doesn't need to incorporate a load of other meanings for the sake of a few dishonest little men who want to lay claim to it.