I am in the middle of a discussion in a political group I am in on the trans issue, and self-identification etc. Someone posted this (as "proof" that the law did not cause women to lose any rights
).
www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/15/monumental-change-ireland-transformed-transgender-rights?CMP=share_btn_tw
A few quotes and comments on it:
"At the age of 19, Glavin was able to undertake a simple legal process to declare herself female."
"There were 277 applications to change gender in Ireland from September 2015, when the legislation came into force, until September 2017. The figures have grown steadily month on month, and activists believe that this gradual increase rather than a sharp spike indicates that people are accessing the facility as they need it along their coming out journey."
"No quantitative research has been completed on the effects of the legislation but activists report that it has had the significant knock-on effect of a reduction in mental distress. "
Well they would, wouldn't they.
"Among those the Guardian spoke to, there was no evidence of the legislation leading to individuals – in particular teenagers – being pressured to undertake medical transition, or men falsely declaring themselves female in order to invade women-only spaces, as some feminist activists have feared."
Nice dig there are stupid feminists. Key phrase there is "amongst those the Guardian spoke to", and there is no evidence they spoke to anyone even remotely questioning, critical or even a source that could give any kind of valid answer.
As far as I can make out Ireland houses prisoners by biological sex, not identity (I have written to a government minister to clarify this).
"Critics of self-declaration have also raised concerns about the impact on the monitoring of sex discrimination and the provision of sex-segregated services, such as refuges or prisons, but, with relatively low numbers of applicants in Ireland, no such conflicts have been initially reported."
They don't explain who they spoke to to check this. Also, lets face it, women are used to having their boundaries run rough-shod over. I think there would be no reporting to police unless it was very bad, and where else would they report other problems? And how would the journalist know if they had, as they might be more civil than criminal issues? If someone reported a problem but got knocked down at the first hurdle, they might give up and it might not go any further than a local facility manager or the like (although I think on the whole gyms and the like would side with women and not people who were clearly male).
Now I can well believe, considering the small number, and different cultural situation, that there may not have been any instances in terms of what people would deem abuse or of women losing out. There seem to have been only very small numbers of school-age children, so possibly no girls got passed over for sports or the like for that age.
"While political consultation is key, according to James Morton, manager of the Scottish Trans Alliance, another feature propelling reform in Scotland has been the close collaboration between feminist and transgender activists. This has been far less apparent in the debate around Westminster reform.
“In Scotland there’s really strong communication between women’s equality organisations, trans equality organisations, politicians and civil servants. Scottish Women’s Aid and Rape Crisis Scotland have become trans-inclusive without any problems occurring, demonstrating that improving trans equality is fully compatible with improving women’s equality, and avoided misunderstandings about legal reform.”
England’s equality sector is more fragmented, Morton suggests, and it is harder to communicate with politicians in Westminster. “Sadly, this can create fears and myths about trans equality but constructive discussions are making positive progress. As people look into the facts and speak in depth with trans people, they start to appreciate the need to improve trans equality.”