I complained to the BBC last week. This is what I said:
"Complaint Summary: John Humphrys
Full Complaint: I'm disgusted that JH is still on air after his recorded conversation with Jon Sopel. Why is he allowed to conduct interviews on the topic of equal pay while female journalists who have made public comments are not?"
This was their response, received today:
"Thank you for contacting us about the off-air conversation between Jon Sopel and John Humphrys. The BBC has been clear that this was an ill-advised conversation and has stated that it is committed to getting its pay structures right. It is conducting a comprehensive analysis of presenter pay which is expected to be published at the end of the month.
John Humphrys is bound by the same rules on impartiality as all other BBC presenters. Staff are entitled to their own opinions but if they choose to campaign on a topic publicly, then judgements are made as to whether they can go on to interview people on that subject. In this case, John was clearly not ‘campaigning’ on the topic.
We are grateful that you have taken the time to contact us. Please be assured that your complaint has been included on our audience feedback report that is seen by BBC senior management."
I feel like they've completely side-stepped the issue. Yes, JH was not "campaigning" on the topic, but he clearly has biased views about it and should not have been presenting on it.