I agree the content is good, but the expression is poor.
With a few tweaks, this could read like the homophobia of old, and so it plays into the 'wrong side of history' narrative that has silenced many people, and in effect, delayed the opposition to transgenderism. It will play well with the express readership, I'm sure, but that doesn't feel comfortable to me.
I think we need to be careful about this, especially if (as suggested on another thread) the Labour party is treading softly round this as they don't want to alienate their young supporters. What we see in that article is the 'common sense' tone, we also need the radical, gender critical argument