Thanks, BlindYeo for those links - if they have been posted before, I've not seen them, so it was good to read.
As a post-operative MtF Transsexual I find it very interesting to read articles about de-transitioning. I'll add here that I'm perfectly satisfied with my transition and everything is going pretty good with my life post-transition. Family, friends, job - and society in general. I live successfully in my acquired gender and have no real problems due to being trans. Issues I do have are experienced by women all over the world, so I fight Feminist issues - not "trans" issues.
Anyway - there are Standards of Care when a person wishes to undertake a medical transition. Medical standards that have been proven over decades of use to ensure that errors are not made. All medical procedures have a certain "regret rate" (with perhaps the exception of Euthanasia, as the figures for "regret" tend not to be available). When I read these stories, I look for the Standards of Care and how (or whether) they were followed.
The first Standards were devised by Harry Benjamin [Ref-1]. These set out very strict requirements for a Trans-presenting patient to meet, if medical assistance were to be offered. Dr Benjamin died in 1986.
The Standards of Care were changed in 1979 to WPATH - World Professional Association for Transgender Health, although they were very much based upon Harry Benjamin's work. The Standards of Care are often seen as cruel and intrusive:
"The Eligibility Criteria and Readiness Criteria give certain very specific minimum requirements as prerequisites to HRT or sex reassignment surgery (SRS). For this and other reasons, the WPATH-SOC is a highly controversial and often maligned document among patients seeking medical intervention (hormones, and/or surgery), who state that their legally protected right to proper medical care and treatment is unjustly and unduly withheld or even denied based on the SOC." [Ref-2] This is the critical point here! Self-identifying Trans people find the medically-approved path through transition to be "highly controversial" and "maligned", so they by-pass the current scientific and medical thinking. Not having years of counselling prior to surgery or not following the Standards AT ALL will inevitably result in an artificially-high number of cases of "Trans" - and higher cases of regret.
In America, where you can get surgery to look like a fucking lizard if you pay, things like Standards of Care aren't rigidly enforced. You pay - you get! Here in the UK, things are more tightly regulated, however I have very serious concerns that even in this country, things are "slacking". I have huge faith in the UK Gender Clinic system, but (IMO) things should actually be getting tighter - genuine cases will still be treated, but there shouldn't be a sudden increase is the numbers of genuine Trans - possibly just because of lobby groups or "fashion". If Gender Disphoria is a medically-diagnosable condition, detectable by scientific means, it should be held up to professional scrutiny on a case-by-case basis.
The (perceived??) increase in de-transitioning must surely be due to an increase in mis-diagnosis of Gender Disphoria - either medically diagnosed or Self-Certified! All the cases of de-transitioning I've ever read involve some sort of non-conformance with the Standards of Care And there it is - Self-Certified - BINGO!!!
I followed the SoC under the NHS and although they are very strict and prolonged, they are absolutely necessary! I'll leave this post at that, as it's getting a little "ranty", but I hope others can see what I'm getting at.
References:
1 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Benjamin
2 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standards_of_Care_for_the_Health_of_Transsexual,_Transgender,_and_Gender_Nonconforming_People