I'm really not sure what to make of some of these comments.
I was irritated by the original post and can see clearly that if the words men and women are reversed, I think that, "Yes, some men openly negate and demean women".
It doesn't matter that not all men do this. What does matter is that all men benefit, within a patriarchal society, from it. An example of this is the consumption of pornography. An extension of this is the pressure put on women to be sexually alluring and available to men at all times. And if women are not pleasing to the male gaze, they should be silent and keep out of the way.
The message is one of objectification and the rendering down of Woman to body parts. No longer human. No longer whole.
Why do we not, in general, see men objecting to pornography? Because they benefit, consciously or not, from the power imbalance generated by it.
Whether we agree on this or not doesn't matter. What does matter is that all women are impacted by the messages sent out.
I see parallels between this and the current TRA situation, whereby there is a separating out of female body parts from the whole woman. A pick and mix approach, if you like, a distancing from Woman, so that a man can play with the bits he likes and ignore and disregard the rest.
I chose to not alter most of the original, very badly written, question, as, paraphrasing the words of Helen Steel, at the meeting in Cambridge,
'We should not have to be perfect in order to speak'.
I know this because I was there. In all my XX glory.