I've just read an article on the BBC News website about a Nursery in the middle of Amsterdam's red light district.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42143635
The theme of the report seems to be that the presence of the nursery is helping locals to live in the city and that the nursery and brothels can co-exist. Comments in the article include 1) That tourists seem shocked that there is a nursery next to a brothel 2) That the women in the brothels are pleasant to the children and that children have questions about what they are doing that they leave for parents to explain (the article explains that the brothel opening hours and nursery opening hours overlap significantly and 3) That staff 'take some time to adjust' to their commute to work through the redlight district.
My reading of the article is that it is being suggested as a good thing that young children and nursery workers become used to seeing the women's bodies for sale as an everyday thing. There are comments about how the children and staff don't judge the women in the brothels and how tourists feel about seeing children in the area. Why no comments about whether anyone judges the -arseholes-- men who pay for sex or how locals feel that women are being raped for money where they live? Why no comments about how women working in the nursery feel about walking past men who clearly see women as objects for their amusement?
Although the article does not specifically state a value judgement the implication seemed to me that it was a good thing that children are growing up to see the sale of women as part of everyday life. Am I overthinking?
(BTW I am not suggesting that the nursery or parents who use it are wrong for being there but that it is depressing that the article does not question whether a red light area should be part of the tourist industry at all)