Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

What it's really like to be a parent of a transgender child - blog

43 replies

raisinsarenottheonlyfruit · 16/11/2017 01:18

This article is so sad. What a shame for this child that there was nowhere in society for her to fit in as a butch girl.

It sounds to me as if the real problem is that no one accepted her as she was.

transgenderjourney.simplesite.com/

The parents have totally swallowed the line that pubery blockers are safe. They are being advised by the Gender Identity Development Service and Mermaids.

Blockers are not hormones and all the evidence suggests they're safe. In fact they've already been used for decades to treat children experiencing a precocious puberty.

The puberty suppressing effects of hormone blockers are completely reversible so if our child changes his mind at any point and stops the injections then a normal female puberty will resume

I have a lot of sympathy for the family as it must be so hard to see your child suffer like that, but IMO the child was sufffering as a girl as people wouldn't accept her as she was, not because she's actually a "boy".

Of course the child feels happier as a boy as she's accepted now. But the problem is society not her. But - I don't envy the parents - if society is at fault and not your child what can you do? You can't just go change society before your child grows up can you?

The child may be happier, but right now they are a child with no need for fertility, sex drive or a partner.

Will they really be happier longer term as an infertile adult with a messed up libido, potential health issues and a relatively small pool of people who will date them? Especially if it comes to pass that they decide in fact they were a butch girl not a boy all along - along with the majory of FTM presenting children.

OP posts:
OlennasWimple · 16/11/2017 14:26

If your 13 year old came to you and said that they wanted to marry their boyfriend; they've always loved him; they are certain that they won't change their mind; it's all they want and if you don't let them, they will kill themselves because they will be so unhappy, they can't possibly wait three years to get married, what would you do?

You would not facilitate a marriage, you would tell them that they are too young to make such an important decision, but if they still feel this way when they are older they can go ahead and get married.

Bucketsandspoons · 16/11/2017 14:30

Cross post with you OP. Massively agree with every word.

OneFlewOverTheDodosNest · 16/11/2017 15:43

What I take from that blog is how vitally important it is for health professionals to be honest and tell the truth. And how dangerous it is when a vested interest group falsely style themselves as experts.

If I was a parent who was directed towards all this information that told me that my child could kill themselves, but don't worry there's a completely reversible drug that will save them, then I think I'd be so relieved I wouldn't even question it. Parents should be able to trust doctors and they should be able to trust groups that are recommended by the NHS (like Mermaids are) but they are being massively let down, actively lied to (re: suicide statistics) and are having dangerous truths hidden from them (side effects of puberty blockers).

jellyfrizz · 16/11/2017 16:18

the concern in its self suggests a transphobic premise that being transgender is an undesirable outcome. It's really not!

I agree. So, why do we need to have a mechanism that says people are legally a different sex? Why is it ok to change a birth certificate? To hide people's histories? There is nothing wrong with being trans so why fight for provision to hide the fact?

Beingrippedoff · 16/11/2017 18:08

jelly that’s such a good point actually re medical history being erased. Why do they want this to happen, instead of just being happy and proud of their new identity. You often hear the phrase ‘coming out’ applied to trans people, yet it’s not really coming out at all, it’s hiding away the truth

TammySwansonTwo · 17/11/2017 11:39

This makes me so angry. Bone density absolutely is not guaranteed to return to normal after cessation - mine hasn't. Perfectly safe? Don't be so ridiculous.

No they're not hormones. That would be one thing. This is essentially telling a developing brain to switch off certain functions. It's infinitely more harmful than giving hormones.

TammySwansonTwo · 17/11/2017 11:48

It actually breaks my heart that children are being given these drugs and that parents are not looking for unbiased information.

When I'd be suffering due to my course of zoladex, I started researching myself. There are thousands of women like me out there, irreparably harmed by these drugs. No one cares or wants to listen. How can they be fed such complete lies - safe, reversible etc? I fear they will have so much regret if they grow up and can barely maintain a career or relationship, their hormones never work properly causing physical and emotional issues, they have such bad fatigue they can barely move and the bones of a pensioner.

These drugs are licensed for a maximum of six months in adult endometriosis sufferers due to the risks associated with longer term use. This isn't a secret in the medical community. But it's okay to keep a child on them for years? How is that possible?

Bucketsandspoons · 17/11/2017 16:03

Tammy So sorry this happened to you. Voices like yours to speak out on this are so important.

TammySwansonTwo · 17/11/2017 17:08

Thanks Bucket - I was seemingly more informed of the risks than many (spoke to one woman who was given the first implant without even being told what it was) but there's still minimal reporting of side effects or understanding of long term implications.

EMSMUM16 · 17/11/2017 23:30

Trans isn't a temporary state of being as I understand it. Its not something that people choose, it is not about 'hiding history', you cannot wipe your medical notes in any case. I think its about identity - any adult can change their identity to some degree (like name changing) and have the right to do so. People have the right to dismiss their past if it's painful or because they don't want to associate with it and become a different gender/person or whatever. I don't understand the problem?

So long as someone is legally able to do so I honestly can't understand why it would be a problem for anyone else. ( I am btw talking about adults here).
I would suggest for most people they feel they have a choice between continuing to live in a state that they cannot tolerate or are comfortable in, or to do the best thing for themselves & their lives, and live as the opposite gender that they were born to.
I just think we need to be more tolerant and move away from stereotyping children and adults to a particular gender now. Its respecting how people feel and want to be viewed, and that can only be expressed by each of us individually and how we experience ourselves in the world.

jellyfrizz · 18/11/2017 00:28

...or to do the best thing for themselves & their lives, and live as the opposite gender that they were born to.
I just think we need to be more tolerant and move away from stereotyping children and adults to a particular gender now.

EMSMUM I agree with your second sentence here. Can you see how your first sentence is in direct conflict with that?

Think about it, without referencing stereotypes how do you 'live as the opposite gender'?
How about people just live how they want whatever sex they were born?

WombOfOnesOwn · 18/11/2017 02:42

Many parents of trans kid blogs are honestly scary, with clear evidence the parent is manipulating the child into transition.

secretlyfabulous.wordpress.com/

This blog's got a mother who withdraws from her child and gets sad any time he doesn't want to be feminine or transition. The child, who has autism and seems to be in a co-dependent relationship with her, will back off and go back to female pronouns or whatever when she does it. He's trying to keep his fertility but she's clearly pressuring him into hormones that will diminish or destroy it.

ALittleBitOfButter · 18/11/2017 03:42

Emsmum do you think google should prevent people being able to access news articles from the past about sex offenders who have been convicted in the past? Should the Aussie Rules footballer transwoman have articles from the past rewritten that mention him being involved in breaking a woman's leg during play?

EMSMUM16 · 18/11/2017 08:55

Jellyfrizz
I think I see what you're saying.
But the second bit about society being more tolerant might take some time.
Really i don't know the answer at all, I just feel that no one should not be judged for being who they are or who they want to be.
Fair point though.

ALittleBitOfButter
I think you are talking about freedom of information here & no if someone has acted dangerously or irresponsibly if its in the public interest and it is true irrespective of gender it should be accessible.
I am saying that if a person wishes to live as a woman or man or neither then why not?

ALittleBitOfButter · 18/11/2017 10:19

But don't you see, that makes you a "hateful transphobic bigot" like the rest of us. You are literally not allowed to question or critique anything.

This is what you said:

People have the right to dismiss their past if it's painful or because they don't want to associate with it and become a different gender/person or whatever. I don't understand the problem?

When the media ran a story about that sex offender who was transferred into a women's jail, but was subsequently removed for harassing women, all Punk News had to say was that he was being "deadnamed". Fuck his victims.

And posters on here then discovered accounts of his crimes had been legally supressed in partnership with Google.

ALittleBitOfButter · 18/11/2017 10:20

*Pink not Punk

Bucketsandspoons · 18/11/2017 12:25

no one should not be judged for being who they are or who they want to be.

Agree 100%. Wholly behind that. For everyone, without exception. I've never actually seen a post from anyone on MN who disagrees with that.

The thing is, that isn't the issue . The whole issue can be summarised as 'your right to wave your fist around ends at someone else's nose'. This isn't about live and let live, it's about a minority group pursuing specific legal 'rights' that will seriously impact, infringe upon and reduce the wellbeing of women and girls, and even worse upon children and their parents. It's about that group freely using extremely violent, anti woman rhetoric including a very high number of threats of rape and killing for women failing to conform.

I don't judge anyone for being who they are, presenting however they want. I massively judge and want nothing to do with anyone who threatens to rape or murder to further their political agenda - and I don't care what that agenda is. Violence is wrong. I massively judge male born people with zero respect or care for female born people, because they see female as lower status and want that enforced in law. I massively judge following a political agenda above child protection and safeguarding.

If you want to call me a bigot for that then I am really ok with it. Sad It isn't hatred, it's about standing up and saying, these things are wrong .

Bucketsandspoons · 18/11/2017 12:35

As a social movement it comes down to boundaries and where they are in society. Can we be liberal to the point that everything is acceptable and should be respected?

Are you ok with a vulnerable teenaged male born but trans identified since the age of 3 person who is afraid of entering the men's toilets so comes into the womens?

Are you ok with respecting and supporting someone who wishes to dress as a woman and hang out in women's changing rooms for sexual pleasure, being aroused by any female who happens to be in there with him?

Are you ok with a middle aged adult male who wishes to dress as a female young child and perform sexual fetish in a changing room around women and children?

Are you ok with someone who wants you to accept and support them as a pedophile because that's their authentic self, they can't help being born that way and that's who they're happy being?

Where do you draw the line? At some point society has to say, who
matters most here? How do we decide who gets to indulge themselves to the detriment of others? How do we rank them? How big a detriment should we be ok with? What happens when those who are disadvantaged by this get angry with being disadvantaged and turn on those groups with better rights than they have?

These are things that need to be talked about and thought of before a whole lot of MPs vote thinking this is just a case of 'live and let live'.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread