I do not respect his candour, and here's to why: All this article demonstrates is how much self-awareness a sexual predator actually possesses. If he knows how and why it's wrong now, he knew how and why he was pushing and breaking boundaries before.
It's pretty much written in law and been codified culturally that sexual assault is a moral/ethical violation. The only gray area surrounds what can and cannot be proven in a criminal court. I translate the whole article as reading "Holy shit women might be taken more seriously now, I was only going to assault them when I thought I'd deffo get away with it, now that it's clear that isn't the case I'm going to overcompensate to try and escape any real responsibility."
I think for any self aware contrition to exist there would need to be a pledge to any woman who came forward that he would plead guilty to any charges and not drag her name through the mud, and be willing to pay his debt to society such as was decided in a law court.
One final parting question, if he's a blogger, and made media appearances he's presumably getting paid, making money or at the very least raising his profile so in essence his abuse of women will make him richer and more powerful won't it?