A quick summary: Court is a very successful female tennis player who has broken many world records. Sadly, she is vocally anti-LGBT and has made some appalling statements about lesbians.
However, what I want to discuss here is this bizarre Guardian opinion piece on the subject: www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jun/02/yes-margaret-court-lesbians-can-rise-to-the-top-in-tennis-other-sports-too
It seems to confirm that gender and biological sex are not synonymous, but in the same breath supports the transgender ideology? The article is trying to be everything to everyone, but failing miserably? Or is it just me?
In other words, Court being a tomboy was OK on account of the fact that she remained certain of her core “nature” as a woman. For her, this is symbolised by her desire to wear dresses as well as shorts – or the fact that she was feminine even though she had a “masculine” prowess for sport. But, she fears, with anti-bullying programs such as Safe Schools (singled out for condemnation as the work of the “devil”), children may no longer be so assured of their “rightful” gender identities – and by extension, their sexualities.