I nearly made a thread before but changed my mind. A so called "radical feminist" group I am part of have supported a letter writing campaign on behalf of a transwoman who was convicted of a violent crime against a woman.
The support page identifies this person as trans front and centre, however newspaper reports covering the crime (which are 7 years old) only call them a woman and do not at any point mention that they were born male (even the DM who did a complete hate-mongering piece didn't). This leads me to believe the person had surgically transitioned at the time of the attack. The person has seemingly severe mental health issues following significant childhood abuse and has suffered with addiction. The treatment has been identified but not given, or given and withdrawn due to prison restructuring.
I decided against making the thread in the end for a couple of reasons-
1- I am quite inclined to agree with the campaign and may well actively support it (it's one of a number of cases covering all genders -in whatever sense of the word- that is being covered by the campaigners).
2- Although this person is not biologically female and attacked a woman they are being treated, in prison, as a woman and therefore their plight is representative of womens experience with services in prison (this is a bit of a head worker and I may make a thread about this if I can articulate my thoughts clearly enough).
So what's my point? I'm not sure, I suppose it's that I have empathy for this person. I agree they are victim as well as perpetrator and the prison system has let them down horribly. I just don't think it's an appropriate campaign for a radical feminist group to be throwing their weight behind, especially as the campaign group who are championing them have women they support as well.
The posts about Chelsea Manning (who I know very little about) reminded me of this.
*Caveat - All of the above is only if the information on the campaign page is accurate, I haven't looked for additional sources or how legitimate it is.