Wow, that article makes for very uncomfortable reading. 75% of it seems to be the writer sycophantly swooning over the both of them. It actually read a bit like one of those 'at home with...' articles that appear in Hello magazine. But wth the added 'twist' of discussing a rape allegation...
""Expertly diving to catch the bits of food that the baby launches at the hotel’s posh carpet and hand-painted wallpaper is a man with a familiar face. It’s a nice face, but it has excited the most extraordinary hatred and loathing these past five years. The face of a pariah; a man so reviled that, even after he had done his time (for a crime we now know he didn’t commit)"
I got as far as this before had to go in another room and take a few deep breaths before I could carry on reading. It's rage inducing, but at the same time almost laughable in just how ridiculous it it.
He has 'a nice face'?
As opposed to what?
And why the fuck do we need to know about the fucking'hand painted wallpaper'???
If they genuinely 'felt sorry' for hs victim the kindest thing to do would be to fade away and live their lives quietly; not do interviews for a national newspaper with an arse-licking journalist. (Would they have been paid for this?)
His victim must feel like she can never be free of him 