I know this is hardly the most pressing issue in the whole trans debate but nevertheless, humour me......... In light of so many transwomen feeling no need to look particularly like a woman (I suppose I am thinking of the thread about Danielle Muscato, in particular) - ie they have beards and penises etc, it seems strange that the one thing which they all have in common is that they have changed their names to names that are normally for women. If a man can 'feel like a woman', despite having a beard, a penis, being tall and muscular etc, then why can't he also 'feel like a woman' and, therefore, 'be' a woman whilst being called Dave or John??
Also, as has been noticed before, it's interesting that many transwomen seem to choose names that are associated with younger women or women's names that have been coined relatively recently such as Kellie, Caitlyn, Danielle, Nikki, Brittany etc I haven't heard of any Barbaras, Susans, Margarets.
I wonder if it is the same for transmen? Do they call themselves David, George, Frank? Or have they all become Connor, Reece, Ryan or Ollie? It would be interesting to do a study on transwomen's and transmen's name choices relative to their age and the popularity of the chosen name at the time of their birth.
But, anyway, my main point is - why do transpeople have to change their names at all, if they don't have to change anything else?